Log in

View Full Version : Addonics Launches Tiny USB NAS Adapter


Hooch Tan
12-16-2008, 03:00 AM
<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://www.ehomeupgrade.com/2008/12/12/addonics-intros-a-55-nas-adapter-for-usb-storage-drives/' target='_blank'>http://www.ehomeupgrade.com/2008/12...storage-drives/</a><br /><br /></div><p><em>"Ever wish you could convert your large external USB storage drive into an NAS server? Well, Addonics says you can easily for $55. Just plug your USB drive to the back of this peripheral and connect the adapter via Ethernet to your router and you&rsquo;re good to go. The Addonics NAS Adapter essentially converts your drive instantly into a network SAMBA share accessible by any Windows, Mac, or Linux PC. What&rsquo;s more, users can FTP to their drive as well as use it as a BitTorrent appliance or print server."</em></p><p><img src="http://images.thoughtsmedia.com/resizer/thumbs/size/600/dht/auto/1229388750.usr20447.jpg" style="border: 0px solid #d2d2bb;" /></p><p>Since its release, some more details have surfaced about this wee NAS.&nbsp; It can also act as a UPnP AV server.&nbsp; However, the NAS needs to format any drive you want, in FAT32 no less, and its hobbled with a 10/100 ethernet port.&nbsp; The price is attractive, and it pretty much sips power, but a lot of compromises have been made.&nbsp; For someone who just wants to have a low power NAS solution to back up some files, this might work, but I have some concerns about it being able to perform the more demanding tasks one expects from a NAS.&nbsp; I have doubts to whether it can sustain one or more HD feeds or whether it can quickly manage large backups like system images.&nbsp; The NAS doesn't provide any fault tolerance either.&nbsp; Until these doubts about these tiny NAS devices have been addressed, I'll stick to a more powerful storage solutions.</p>

Stinger
12-16-2008, 12:20 PM
I don't think you need to worry about the 10/100 ethernet port hobbling this thing. Judging by similar models, the CPU won't be able to process anything near 100Mbps.

Jason Dunn
12-18-2008, 06:30 PM
Looks like a nice, cheap solution for someone who wants something ultra-basic.

Hooch Tan
12-25-2008, 06:04 AM
It's cheap, but I could only see this as a backup server. I agree that that CPU is unlikely to be able to sustain a 100mbps feed, which means for a demanding NAS, you'd have to look elsewhere. But if all you're looking for is a backup solution, wouldn't an external HDD be just as good?