Pardon The Slowness...

[Janak Parekh]

We're doing some heavy log reprocessing right now, so the site might be a little slower than usual for the next hour or so. Apologies for the inconvenience, and the site should be back up to full speed before long. (And no, we didn't just switch back to the old box. :lol:)<br /><br /><img src="http://www.pocketpcthoughts.com/images/hansberry/2003/20030716-logprocessing.jpg" />

[dean_shan]

Nice picture. :lol:

[Janak Parekh]

Nice picture. :lol:
I didn't put it! 8O

OK, who's the wise guy on the news team? :lol:

(Nice picture though, I agree.)

--janak

[rmasinag]

He said....he said log.....huhuhuhuhuhuhuuhuhuh.... :oops:

[dean_shan]

I didn't put it! 8O
So that would explain why I could have sworn it wan't there the first time I looked at it.

[Hyperluminal]

Nice. :lol:
Log reprocessing... groan. ;)

[beq]

J, I think you should ask your wayward mod-in-training ;)

[Kati Compton]

Wasn't me! Though it would fit my sense of humor. ;)

[droppedd]

if it's a pun, that would put Steve Cedrone on my list of suspects :D .

[Janak Parekh]

if it's a pun, that would put Steve Cedrone on my list of suspects :D .
It's not Steve. ;) I figured it out; can you?

--janak

[ctmagnus]

if it's a pun, that would put Steve Cedrone on my list of suspects :D .
It's not Steve. ;) I figured it out; can you?

--janak

Ed? Brad? Crystal? Jason?

[bleeman]

I figured it out thanks to a review of the resources used to place the picture there. What I found was both enlightening and very interesting. You can figure it out yourself if you take a BOLD look at my message :lol:

[ctmagnus]

I figured it out thanks to a review of the resources used to place the picture there. What I found was both enlightening and very interesting. You can figure it out yourself if you take a BOLD look at my message :lol:

See? I was right, first time!

[bleeman]

Yup! If it hadn't taken so long to put together my goofy little message I would have beaten you with my post too :D

It took awhile to come up with a message that sounded on topic and had the letters I needed in it. :crazyeyes:

[Ed Hansberry]

I figured it out thanks to a review of the resources used to place the picture there. What I found was both enlightening and very interesting. You can figure it out yourself if you take a BOLD look at my message :lol:
LOL! Very creative! :way to go:

[bleeman]

:oops: Thanks! I think I was sufferring from sleep deprivation as I normally don't have a creative bone in my body as friends and family will often to eagerly attest to :)

I did discover though that if you view the forums via your PPC it probably doesn't make any sense as it doesn't show the BOLD attribute unless I've got something set wrong on my iPAQ.

[Jason Dunn]

I did discover though that if you view the forums via your PPC it probably doesn't make any sense as it doesn't show the BOLD attribute unless I've got something set wrong on my iPAQ.

No, it's a lag of proper HTML support in Pocket Internet Explorer, and there's some crazy bug with the &lt; span > tag to boot. Grr.

:bad-words:

[Ed Hansberry]

I did discover though that if you view the forums via your PPC it probably doesn't make any sense as it doesn't show the BOLD attribute unless I've got something set wrong on my iPAQ.

No, it's a lag of proper HTML support in Pocket Internet Explorer, and there's some crazy bug with the &lt; span > tag to boot. Grr.
Sort of funny. In 2002, bold wouldn't turn on. In 2003, it won't turn off. :-)

[bleeman]

Thanks for the explanation on the BOLD issue guys! Glad to know it has nothing to do with my normal ineptitude at configuring things :confused totally: