Jason Dunn
12-21-2006, 03:53 AM
I was down at a local camera store today, picking up some paper for the new R1800 Epson printer. I've decided to keep it: all my research points me toward the fact that Epson will be providing a Windows Vista driver, and that the R1800 will remain the "new" model for at least a while yet. And for the price, it's hard to argue even if a newer model comes out in mid-2007. I can't get over how expensive paper is though: I picked up three packages of paper, and my bill was $157 CAN ($140 USD)! 20 sheets of 13" x 19" semi-gloss ($69.95), 50 sheets of 13" x 19" heavyweight matte ($54.95), and 25 sheets of 8.5" x 11" Ilford Galerie Smooth Gloss ($23.95). I peered at the Epson paper sample book for quite some time, and I believe the semi-gloss will give me the look I'm aiming for. We'll see once my heart-rate hits 120 bpm and I hit print... ;-)
The 8.5 x 11" paper was what I was curious about: does anyone know why 8.5 x 11" paper is so popular for inkjet printers? It's incredibly hard to find frames for that size of paper - most are cheap document frames. 8 x 10" is the standard photography size in North America, so going into any store you'll find frames in 4 x 6", 5 x 7", 8 x 10", etc. I always found it baffling that Canon never made 8 x 10" paper - Epson does, but at the store today all they had was 8.5 x 11". So what am I missing here? Surely people aren't printing full-bleed then cutting the paper? Or is this an artifact from before full-page printers and in order to get an 8 x 10" print people would print on the bigger 8.5 x 11"? I've always been curious about this big have never managed to find a logical answer.
The 8.5 x 11" paper was what I was curious about: does anyone know why 8.5 x 11" paper is so popular for inkjet printers? It's incredibly hard to find frames for that size of paper - most are cheap document frames. 8 x 10" is the standard photography size in North America, so going into any store you'll find frames in 4 x 6", 5 x 7", 8 x 10", etc. I always found it baffling that Canon never made 8 x 10" paper - Epson does, but at the store today all they had was 8.5 x 11". So what am I missing here? Surely people aren't printing full-bleed then cutting the paper? Or is this an artifact from before full-page printers and in order to get an 8 x 10" print people would print on the bigger 8.5 x 11"? I've always been curious about this big have never managed to find a logical answer.