Log in

View Full Version : C|NET Reviews the Nikon D200


Jason Dunn
02-15-2006, 02:00 PM
<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://reviews.cnet.com/Nikon_D200_with_18mm_to_70mm_zoom_lens/4505-6501_7-31650273.html?subj=fdba&part=rss&tag=MR_Search+Results' target='_blank'>http://reviews.cnet.com/Nikon_D200_with_18mm_to_70mm_zoom_lens/4505-6501_7-31650273.html?subj=fdba&part=rss&tag=MR_Search+Results</a><br /><br /></div><i>"The Nikon D200, a long-awaited successor to the company's D100, offers serious amateur photographers and value-minded professionals a compact, sub-$2,000 digital SLR with many of the specifications, features, and build characteristics of Nikon's high-end pro cameras. Although not quite the junior version of the top-of-the-line D2X that some had hoped for, the D200 offers a significant step up from Nikon's low-end D70s and D50 models, with 10.2-megapixel resolution, a rugged moisture- and dust-sealed magnesium-alloy body, a large viewfinder, a 5fps drive mode, and bountiful fine-tuning and customization options. Accessories including Nikon iTTL external flash units, a Wi-Fi transmitter, a burgeoning line of digital optics, and third-party GPS units give the D200 enough versatility to compete effectively with its pricier midrange competitor, the full-frame Canon EOS 5D."</i><br /><br /><img src="http://www.digitalmediathoughts.com/images/nikon-d200-small.jpg" /><br /><br />A solid review of the D200 from C|NET - it's one of the longer reviews I've ever read from them. The review comes out extremely positive for the D200 - in reading it, there were hardly any serious concerns, so the score of 8.3 out of 10 seems a touch low. One of their criticisms, however, is the lack of a TIFF option. Is that really an issue anymore? TIFF was important before RAW was common, and if you have RAW you have a lossless-compressed image, so why would you need TIFF? And their other Con was "JPEG artifacts crimp image quality" - but there's no mention in the article of what they're talking about that I could see. It almost seems like they're looking for things to complain about. Hey C|NET, that's my job! :lol:<br /><br />I'm telling you, Canon had better coming out with a <b>KILLER</b> upgrade to the 20D soon, or I'm jumping ship to Nikon. The D200 looks like a fantastic camera, and I'm itching to buy one. Must...hold...off.

flooder
02-15-2006, 03:34 PM
Looks very tempting.

I am waiting for Sony to eventually scare me and make me jump ship from Minolta.

Nikon has a great flash system, but I like Cannon glass.

Choices . . . . Choices.

Damion Chaplin
02-15-2006, 04:07 PM
Why do I need a GPS unit for my camera?

Sounds like something someone cooked up after watching the Blair Witch Project.

flooder
02-15-2006, 04:18 PM
Why do I need a GPS unit for my camera?

Ariel photography is the main use.

Here is a famous example. http://www.californiacoastline.org/

Jason Dunn
02-15-2006, 05:19 PM
Why do I need a GPS unit for my camera?

A great question! I'm going to answer on the front page because I think it might kick off an interesting discussion.

Lee Yuan Sheng
02-15-2006, 05:23 PM
Nature photography is one main use, particularly for those who're more on the documentation side of things.

02-15-2006, 08:53 PM
Why do I need a GPS unit for my camera?

Sounds like something someone cooked up after watching the Blair Witch Project.

The question is, why wouldn't you. If nothing else, location will be a very powerful search parameter like time.

Malte

marlof
02-16-2006, 08:19 AM
On Smugmug, the GPS info will give you the option to use the Map This! functionality, which shows where you've taken the picture on Google maps. I don't use it, but I can see the advantages of this.