Log in

View Full Version : Pentium Extreme Edition model 840 3.2GHz - Dual-Core CPU


Jason Dunn
04-05-2005, 07:00 PM
<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://www.trustedreviews.com/article.aspx?head=60&page=2751' target='_blank'>http://www.trustedreviews.com/article.aspx?head=60&page=2751</a><br /><br /></div><i>"Pentium 4 is dead, and in its place we get two flavours of dual core processor for the desktop. The king of the heap is Pentium Extreme Edition which has dual cores with Hyper-Threading so one physical processor appears as four virtual processors. This will inevitably be the US $999 part that looks good on paper but doesn’t get bought so Intel came up with the bright idea of a dual core part called Pentium D that doesn’t have Hyper-Threading. It runs on the same 800MHz FSB and has the same cache but it appears as two virtual processors, just like the current Prescott. No doubt Pentium Extreme Edition will move to a 1066MHz FSB, which will allow Intel to enable HT in Pentium D but for now it all looks like a bit of a marketing nightmare."</i><br /><br /><img src="http://www.digitalmediathoughts.com/images/1241-chip.jpg" /><br /><br />I've been looking forward to dual-core CPUs for a while now, but not for the reason that most are: I was using a dual Celeron 400mhz Abit BP-6 rig years ago, so I'm very familiar with what the real benefits of multiple processors are. In some applications, those designed to take advantage multiple CPUs, there can be huge performance boosts. Encoding a video with four CPUs (two physical, two virtual) will be radically faster, but will four CPUs help you start Word faster? No. What it will do, however is allow two things:<br /><br />1) You can do more at once without fear of one application stomping on another. For example, when I play a game on my laptop I always shut everything else down to get maximum performance. I might not need to do that anymore on a system with multiple CPUs, although there would have to be an operating system change as well to prevent other applications from throwing pop-up windows into your full-screen gaming experience.<br /><br />2) Programs will be able to run background tasks that would otherwise bog down a machine. For example, Windows Media Player could finally get true network folder monitoring, constantly scanning for new files and updating the library instead of the broken, twitchy experience we have now. :roll:

jeffd
04-05-2005, 09:51 PM
accept for the fact that 1 core != 1 of todays fast cpus. A multi core working together beats todays cpus, but on a per core baises.. they are slower, so what happens to %99 of the games and cpu intensive applications still designed around one cpu?

Jason Dunn
04-08-2005, 12:09 AM
so what happens to %99 of the games and cpu intensive applications still designed around one cpu?

You'll see no performance benefit in the single application, but you WILL see greater responsiveness and system stability when running muliple applications (which all of us do). And if you give developers more horsepower, they'll use it, so perhaps we'll see some games and mainstream applications in 2006 that will be more multi-CPU friendly.

Jason Dunn
04-08-2005, 12:16 AM
Wake me up when the dual-core Opteron's and a dual socket Shuttle SFF come out.

Heh. That might be a while - if the dual-core Opteron's are going to be anything like Intel's dual-core solutions, they'll be VERY power hungry and hot. It will be quite an engineering feat to get two of them into a Shuttle XPC and have the power supply big enough to run it and a high-end video card...

Lee Yuan Sheng
04-08-2005, 03:10 AM
Eh, if you want power, get a midi tower at least. Would a Lian Li PC-V1000 make you happy? I know it will for me! =D