Log in

View Full Version : What Bit Rate Do You Rip Your CD's In?


Jason Dunn
11-26-2004, 04:00 PM
Yesterday we had the survey about what format people use to rip in (WMA, MP3, etc.) and now we come to the question of bit-rate. The higher the bit rate, the higher the quality of the audio playback - but every codec is capable of differing levels of quality at the same bit rate, so one size does not fit all. Once you factor in headphones/speakers, and the auditory canals of the person listening, bit rate becomes an intensely personal choice.

Myself, I started out years ago ripping in MP3 format, at 128 kbps - likely because it was the default. Then a few months later when I realized how insanely cool it was to have all my music on my computer all at once, I switched to using Audiograbber and the Xing MP3 encoder (I had to pay for both - the "old days" were expensive!) using 160 kbps VBR. I kept that quality setting and those programs for quite a long time, until I switched over to using WMA 160 kbps CBR. Now and then I'll bump it to 190 kbps, but other than a brief 60 day foray back into the seedy MP3 world, I've stuck with 160 kbps WMA for quite a while.

So I'm curious, what bit rate do you usually rip your CDs at, and why? What shaped that decision? And has that changed over the past year or two? I'm not asking about CBR and VBR because that would make far too many options. If I didn't list your exact bit rate, just pick the one closest to what you rip at.

entropy1980
11-26-2004, 04:44 PM
I rip all mine at 320kbps MP3... with hard drive space so cheap no reason not to go big and MP3 still is the most playable on any machine/device....

James Fee
11-26-2004, 05:22 PM
I used to rip at 192kbps into MP3, but now I use Apple Lossless. I've stopped buying tracks online because of the poor sound quality with them. Apple Lossless only works with iTunes and the iPod, but I don't see myself leaving that platform anytime soon.

Maybe you should add a lossless option for those who use FLAC (http://flac.sourceforge.net/) or Apple Lossless?

that_kid
11-26-2004, 05:39 PM
I rip all my mp3's at 256K, I would like to use apple's lossless compression but I wouldn't be able to play my files in all the places I have players.

mcsouth
11-26-2004, 07:45 PM
As mentioned in the previous poll, I am currently ripping at 64kbps simply to get the small file sizes that allow me to cram lots of music on my 512MB SD card for my pda, and into my 256MB MuVo TX FM player. Since I listen to the music a lot through my PC, I would like to rerip at a higher rate since, as previously mentioned, hard drive space is cheap right now, but haven't thought about how to manage two files of the same song. I probably just need to break down and buy a hard drive based player, so that the file size becomes less of an issue....

phillypocket
11-26-2004, 09:40 PM
You should have added one for the various lossless formats. I use Windows Media Lossless for home (hopefully about to pick up 160 GB drive) and 37-63 WMA VBR for work.

dean_shan
11-26-2004, 10:28 PM
160VBR MP3, plays on anything.

ctmagnus
11-26-2004, 10:58 PM
192-256kbps VBR MP3 for desktop/DAP and ~80-110VBR WMA for Pocket PC. 20 albums on a 1GB SD with 400MB to spare!

RoniXt
11-28-2004, 12:42 AM
I use 192Kbps MP3s for desktops and 96Kbps WMA (V7) for Pocket PCs.
I heard from somewhere (and confirmed myself), that WMA V7 is technically superior to WMAv8 so I haven't left V7 since. I haven't checked out V9 yet though.

MrSums
12-02-2004, 10:58 AM
I know it is supposed to be deprecated, but I use the --r3mix option under lame. This gives a VBR equivalent to 192 or better, but with a file size equivalent to between 96 and 128. I havew tried the more "modern" equivalent settings but these always increase the files size for a given tune.