Jason Dunn
09-08-2004, 03:00 AM
<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,117070,00.asp' target='_blank'>http://pcworld.com/reviews/article/0,aid,117070,00.asp</a><br /><br /></div>"Lovers of high-end PC graphics rejoiced at news of the recent launch of desktops with PCI Express-based chip sets that promise dramatically faster graphics throughput than today's AGP 8X standard. But a preliminary look at two of the first PCI Express cards suggests that the spec will have more impact on future graphics headroom than on immediate performance gains.<br /><br />In fact, our tests showed practically no performance difference between graphics cards using the AGP 8X interface and those using PCI Express. Though PCI Express 16X supports concurrent transfers of up to 4 gigabytes per second compared with AGP 8X's 2.1 GBps of shared bandwidth, even today's most graphics-intensive PC games have yet to turn the AGP conduit into a bottleneck."<br /><br />Nothing terribly surprising here, but good to know nonetheless. For me, buying a PCI Express video card makes sense because it's more future-proof - I typically keep my graphic cards for two generations. That, and the <a href="http://us.shuttle.com/specs2.asp?pro_id=509">Shuttle SB81P</a> doesn't even have an AGP slot. 8)