View Full Version : Musicmatch Jukebox 9.0 is now available
James Fee
07-27-2004, 04:13 AM
<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://www.musicmatch.com/' target='_blank'>http://www.musicmatch.com/</a><br /><br /></div>Features include:<br />• First on-demand music service integrated into all-in-one jukebox - Giving the same ability to play the music universe that customers have now with their own music files. Listeners can save any On Demand track to playlists and music library, and mix and match with MP3s and purchased downloads.<br />• Breakthrough music discovery engine - Always setting Musicmatch apart, and now it's even better. Musicmatch has built a map of the music universe based on billions of play events from its listening community, and you can use it to find the music you'll love.<br />• Browse through up to 100 of the most closely related artists for just about any artist.<br />• Click across related artist links to easily navigate across the music universe.<br />• See all the music available from each artist, in popularity order. When you find an artist you might like, it's easy to listen to their best music first.<br />• Receive daily recommended personalized playlists and artists based on the music other music fans play.<br />• Remote access - Subscribers can access their On Demand library, saved playlists and personalization preferences from any PC.<br />• Share with friends - With the Send to a Friend feature, subscribers can now legally share complete playlists or individual songs, which recipients can listen to up to three times, even if they are not subscribers to the service.<br />• Breakthrough pricing - For the first time, music fans can discover and enjoy $650,000 worth of music, from any PC, for as little as $7.95 per month.<br /><br /> <img src="http://www.digitalmediathoughts.com/images/mmjb_9.jpg" />
Kent Pribbernow
07-27-2004, 04:26 AM
Is that the new interface? It doesn't look any different than version 8. :?
James Fee
07-27-2004, 04:39 AM
Is that the new interface? It doesn't look any different than version 8. :?
Yea, it would appear to be the same....
Now that I have played with it more, lets just say it has evolved rather than changed. :)
Cameron K
07-27-2004, 04:49 AM
Looks like it may be time to switch from Rhapsody to musicmatch. Anyone tried their on demand service? The "share with a friend" feature is what really catches my eye. I'd love to find a legal way to share new music that I've found with my friends. Rhapsody claims to have this feature, only your friend has to also have an account with them, which ten times out of ten isn't the case.
Kent Pribbernow
07-27-2004, 04:49 AM
Still runs as slow as molasses on my PC. Nothing exciting so far. :?
Kent Pribbernow
07-27-2004, 05:00 AM
Lots of goofy characteristics with the UI. You can't double click on a track to preview it but must instead click on a teeny tiny speaker icon. And the program keeps nagging me to upgrade to the paid version. It's worse than Quicktime. :roll:
Jonathon Watkins
07-28-2004, 01:26 AM
Hmmm, maybe I'm best off with sticking to MM 8.2 for the moment then. It's working fine for me and I did not notice anything about actually making it a better player -rather than adding the ability to sell you songs etc. :?
wilkinsjme
08-28-2004, 12:53 AM
I've used this program but have since given up. Actually purchased the lifetime upgrades. The one nice thing I liked about it was the SuperTagging it had. But once you are finished taggings your misc files you are basically left with a slow music player that does essentially what wmp9 does but it's free (so to speak).
I neve messed with the online music. The new sharing features sound pretty good but doesn't apply to my needs. If these features interest you I would say give it a try but if you just want to rip and play music stick with wmp (or a free equiv.)
i'm still using version 7.5
old but reliable.
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.