Jason Dunn
03-11-2004, 07:00 PM
<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://www.redhawkvision.com/Products.html' target='_blank'>http://www.redhawkvision.com/Products.html</a><br /><br /></div><img src="http://www.digitalmediathoughts.com/images/rickylogoSTORE1.jpg" /> <br /><br />"Paparazzi 2.1™, our latest, Fully Integrated Stand-Alone Video-to-RedHawked-Photo software, delivers cropped, color converted, aspect corrected, RedHawked Photo-JPEGs in seconds! David Em at Byte.com called RedHawked images "far superior to the original frames" and said Video Pics is "drop-dead easy to use". And we made Paparazzi 2.1 even easier to use. See what other professionals say. Paparazzi 2.1 increases the value of your video assets, allowing you to supply photographs and high quality images for print and web aplications. Paparazzi combines and automates the entire video-to-photo work-flow, increasing your productivity and delivering ready-to-print photo-JPEGs directly from your video files. No need for Premiere or Photoshop - Paparazzi does it all in a single, highly automated process. As easy to use as a camera."<br /><br />If you've ever needed to pull a high-quality still from a video, you know how challenging it can be. There are certainly limits to how good it can be, just based on the resolution alone, but this software claims to make that process more effective. After looking through the site, I'd have to agree - the differences in images was quite clear. I also got a kick out of their <a href="http://www.redhawkvision.com/Gallery_Forensic_1.html">Forensic video</a> example - pretty cool to see what kind of data can be recovered from a seemingly useless image!