View Full Version : yslee...got a Q 4 U
Gary Sheynkman
02-06-2004, 05:37 AM
Since you established yourself as a digital camera god I have to ask your oppinion as to which brand for cameras 500-1000 bucks do you like more.
canon
sony
nikon
We'd all like to know :D
Suhit Gupta
02-06-2004, 05:56 AM
BTW what application are you thinking of? In the pro DSLR range or a really fancy point-n-shoot?
Suhit
Lee Yuan Sheng
02-06-2004, 06:03 AM
Eh, don't call me that. I'm sure there're plenty of people better than me in this.
I generally don't have a brand preference, though I've never really liked Sony cameras much. They tend to have more form then function, or otherwise have some terrible consumer-ish "feature" (F707's Disney Colours for example). The new 828 isn't so bad (CF slot some more, no Memory sticks!) though.
Any brand which doesn't have a history in making cameras is also a brand I'd avoid. Beyond that I tend to give recommendations based on one's needs. I don't like issuing blanket statements. =P
Jason Dunn
02-06-2004, 06:12 AM
Yeah, tell us more about what you want to use the camera for Gary...
Gary Sheynkman
02-07-2004, 01:18 AM
Yeah, tell us more about what you want to use the camera for Gary...
taking pictures :lol:
The thing is...how MUCH of a difference is there between a Canon G5 and a ...oh lets say the Rebel in terms of picture quality/features
Jason Dunn
02-07-2004, 01:23 AM
The thing is...how MUCH of a difference is there between a Canon G5 and a ...oh lets say the Rebel in terms of picture quality/features
There's a fair bit of difference actually - best to go look at the photo samples and judge for yourself. I owned a G2, which is similar to the G5, and I'd say the biggest difference is the speed. With the Rebel you can press the button and a photo is taken, instantly. The G5 would likely take a second or two to do the autofocus, etc. That might not sound like much, but when you're doing some serious shooting, the difference is amazing.
Gary Sheynkman
02-07-2004, 02:30 AM
ah....but then there is size...the rebel is a beast. Too bad the sony T1 does not get great pics since the lens is sooo small
Janak Parekh
02-07-2004, 05:14 AM
ah....but then there is size...the rebel is a beast. Too bad the sony T1 does not get great pics since the lens is sooo small
But what do you want? That was Jason's question. If you want casual snapshots, but at reasonably high quality, get a point-and-shoot like the Canon Powershot S-series camera; they give fantastic quality for their size. They're not a DSLR, but they do the job.
If you really want a DSLR, explain why. It's all in the application. People who really need a DSLR are generally willing to overlook the size.
As for me, I've used an Exilim EX-S2 and a Canon S230. The EX-S2 is perfect for me except for the lack of zoom, so the S230 fits my bill perfectly. I have virtually zero interest in getting a DSLR, because the S230 does 99.9999% of what I need.
--janak
Lee Yuan Sheng
02-07-2004, 05:33 AM
A few things.
Small lens != poor lens.
Big lens != good lens.
There're quite a few differences between a Rebel and a G5, and the main ones would be:
1. Resolution
2. Noise (and with that, the ability to go to higher ISOs)
3. Operation Speed
4. Lenses
Once again, I ask yourself what you want out of photography. If you're not sure if you're serious, or you have no idea what you want to do, don't spend so much money.
BTW, if you think the 300D is big, you better not handle my equipment. =P
Gary Sheynkman
02-09-2004, 12:34 AM
Well ok.
The goal is being able to take very good quality pictures in "snapshot form" or when i want to tinker with the camera having a nice feature set (like long exposure times....etc etc).
Market is too diverse...and with the new line of sony camcorders...the desision now also hovers between photo and video... just trying to prioritize before the next vacation.
Suhit Gupta
02-09-2004, 04:56 PM
The goal is being able to take very good quality pictures in "snapshot form" or when i want to tinker with the camera having a nice feature set (like long exposure times....etc etc).
Market is too diverse...and with the new line of sony camcorders...the desision now also hovers between photo and video... just trying to prioritize before the next vacation.
Agreed that there are tons of cameras to choose from. This is exactly why you need to figure out what kind of pictures you want to take. I still assert that you are not saying this. Most of the $500+ cameras allow a fair bit of "tinkering". But like yslee points out resolution, noise and shutter speed choices will change drastically depending on what kind of pictures you want to ultimately take. (for example: lot of portraits, vs. landscapes vs. action shots).
Suhit
Lee Yuan Sheng
02-09-2004, 05:15 PM
That is true. So far you've been fairly vague on what you want..
Gary Sheynkman
02-10-2004, 01:15 AM
Its not that im vague, its that im inexperienced in the field. Thus, I do not know exactly the features I want/will use in a camera :wink:
I guess if a good deal comes up on the rebel i will snatch that up
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.