View Full Version : The Big Google Maps Mobile vs. Windows Live Search Showdown
Pete Paxton
08-30-2007, 01:00 PM
<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://jkontherun.blogs.com/jkontherun/2007/08/the-big-google-.html' target='_blank'>http://jkontherun.blogs.com/jkontherun/2007/08/the-big-google-.html</a><br /><br /></div><p><em>"Google Maps Mobile (GMM) is an extremely popular program. Absolutely everyone uses GMM at one point or another because it's so easy and looks pretty. But is there another game in town? Dwight Silverman of TechBlog put Google Maps Mobile head-to-head against Windows Live Search (WLS) on the Windows Mobile platform and it may surprise some that he found WLS the clearcut winner. It doesn't surprise me because I have used WLS on my WM phones for some time and find it gives me better answers quicker when I'm looking for something local."</em></p><p><img alt="" border="0" src="http://images.thoughtsmedia.com/resizer/thumbs/size/500/spt/auto/1188446172.usr11642.jpg" /></p><p>Interesting because I've never actually used Google Maps before. I have however used Windows Live Search many many times and I really like it. As a matter of fact, I'd say it's one of my most used programs. I don't feel that I need GPS because Windows Live Search does such a good job for me. So of course you know I'm going to ask, what do you use most often and which do you prefer?</p>
hotdram
08-30-2007, 02:18 PM
For speed of map download: Google Maps
For finding business/directions: WLS - you can select an address from your address book, but with Google, you can't
I have used my BT GPS with both and like WLS better for that function.
~Rob
trolane
08-30-2007, 03:23 PM
Windows Live Over anything else ever.
The GPS in windows live is awesome. I used it to drive to canada and it was dead on accurate from mass to montreal.
The maps are awesome, the application is the best ever for a mobile phone.
David Tucker
08-30-2007, 04:32 PM
Not even remotely surprised. I was using GMM until, one day, I wanted to find a wachovia by my office. I was shocked when it returned only 7 Tampa results. WLS returned over 25.
I unistalled GMM and have noticed ever since how much better my results are on WLS.
Mark Larson
08-30-2007, 06:11 PM
I have always used Google maps, but i'm going to try WLS now. I have it on my device, but never really used it.
I have also noticed the fiddly interface of GMM and would appreciate a more mobile-friendly UI.
WLS is available as a JAR as well, for J2ME MIDP 2.0 phones.
Rocco Augusto
08-30-2007, 09:14 PM
i have them both installed so i usually only use whichever one has an icon on my homescreen when i need it :)
socrates
09-03-2007, 10:48 PM
I had them both installed, but just recently when doing some cleanup I realized I hadn't used the GMM in months so uninstalled it and don't miss it at all. The WLS is great.
Mike Temporale
09-04-2007, 02:37 PM
It's WLS for me. I find the Google maps don't offer the same level of coverage here in Canada. At least not where I roam. I've used WLS a couple times in the last week alone to help navigate around road construction and stuff.
ScooperJay
09-09-2007, 04:17 PM
If you've used both, you know.
Windows Live hands down.
I hate to jump on the bandwagon, but I have found the UI to be a bit better and more responsive than Google's offering.
Now.
I have a Cingular 2125 and want to get a BlueTooth GPS receiver to use with the phone and Windows Live maps. Does anyone have a recommendation?
It appears that "gps" is too small of a word for the forum search functionality, so I'll also post these:
gee pee ess
Global Positioning System
GGPS
Thanks.
hotdram
09-18-2007, 03:55 AM
I have a Cingular 2125 and want to get a BlueTooth GPS receiver to use with the phone and Windows Live maps. Does anyone have a recommendation?
I would look at Globalsat's BT359. SiRFIII, WAAS, EGNOS.
I have a few GPS's with the SiRFIII chipset in them and the acquistion time and receiver sensitivity is amazing. Get a signal anywhere in my house and in dense foliage in the woods. My older, non-SiRFIII units, would not get the reception the SiRFIII ones do.
http://www.usglobalsat.com/item.asp?itemid=134
They list it at $159 USD, but it can be had much cheaper if you poke around.
~Rob
vBulletin® v3.8.9, Copyright ©2000-2019, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.