Lee Yuan Sheng
07-21-2011, 12:11 AM
<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/20/sony-alpha-nex-c3-review/' target='_blank'>http://www.engadget.com/2011/07/20/...-nex-c3-review/</a><br /><br /></div><p><em>"Traditionally known as DSLRs, interchangeable lens cameras (ILC) have always promised excellent image quality, speed, and versatility."</em></p><p><em><img src="http://images.thoughtsmedia.com/resizer/thumbs/size/600/dht/auto/1311203350.usr15670.jpg" style="border: 1px solid #d2d2bb;" /></em></p><p>Umm. So the Engadget review opens with one of the least accurate (or poorly written) statements I have seen in a review for some time. The scary thing is that with Engadget's influence, many are going to look for it as a source. <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">Still, the review does have some real sample photos, so if you're interested in the Sony, you might want to give it a look.</span> The sample photos are shrunken down for the web, so they are essentially useless. Umm, read the review for a user's impressions?</p>