Log in

View Full Version : Nikon D7000 vs D300s Spec Sheet comparison


Lee Yuan Sheng
10-05-2010, 08:30 PM
<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://www.digitalrev.com/en/nikon-d7000-vs-nikon-d300s-6768-article.html' target='_blank'>http://www.digitalrev.com/en/nikon-...68-article.html</a><br /><br /></div><p><em>"It's been a long while since Nikon announced anything before the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.digitalrev.com/en/nikon-d3100-kit-with-18-55mm-vr-9714.html">D3100</a>. So with the&nbsp;<a href="http://www.digitalrev.com/en/nikon-d90-307-category.html">Nikon D90</a>&nbsp;finally being replaced, we are seeing something much more robust in the upcoming&nbsp;<a href="http://www.digitalrev.com/en/nikon-d7000-591-category.html">Nikon D7000</a>. Nikon has tried to be much more careful with their product segmentations without treading on the toes of its other models unlike Canon."</em></p><p><img src="http://images.thoughtsmedia.com/resizer/thumbs/size/600/dht/auto/1286305021.usr15670.jpg" style="border: 1px solid #d2d2bb;" /><span><img src="http://images.thoughtsmedia.com/resizer/thumbs/size/600/dht/auto/1286305006.usr15670.jpg" style="border: 1px solid #d2d2bb;" /></span></p><p><span>Nikon has come up with the D7000, an upscale replacement of the D90, which comes close in many ways to the D300s. For most photo enthusiasts, the newer D7000 is a better choice; the D300s is based on a two-year old camera that now will serve mostly professionals who need certain features for their work but can't wait for the D300s follow-up. If you still have a D300 or D300s, the D7000 is not likely to be an upgrade unless you need video on a DSLR, so fret not. Anyone eagerly waiting for the D7000?</span></p>