Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!

Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...

Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Articles & Resources

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2010, 04:00 PM
Brad Wasson
Contributing Editor
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 118
Default Smartphones Is It The Total Experience That Makes The Difference?

I regularly get asked by friends and colleagues for technology advice, and smartphones are a frequent topic. A recent conversation with a colleague got me thinking about how the smartphone marketplace was evolving, and how people might be making purchasing decisions over the next year or so. Purchasing behaviour is of course a complex topic, one that requires unique analysis expertise within the personnel of any product vendor. I'm not a marketing guru by any stretch, but, like you, I do have some opinions on the factors that influence people one way or another in the smartphone world.

We are strongly influenced by marketing, and most product manufacturers spare no expense on this endeavour. But marketing really only gets you interested in a particular product and starts you on the path towards purchase. Typically you still need to hold and try the device, evaluate its capability in your personal use paradigm, and consider its overall cost. In short, there is a sales-related experience, and, after purchase, an ongoing "use experience" that influence your overall satisfaction with the phone and your likelihood to commit to the platform.

Let's consider the overall marketplace. There are many base platforms, and lots (really tons) of phone choices on each one. There is a clear trend to blurring of the feature phone/smartphone marketplaces, and differentiating products on this basis is getting more and more complex. With all this choice, how does a consumer make their ultimate product purchase?

I postulate that the final buying decision, for most consumers, is based on their total experience. Let's consider a fictitious new measure, Total eXperience Index (TXI). What parameters would be included?

  • Influence due to marketing, peer influence, and overall trends
  • Aesthetic appearance and feel (uniqueness, screen size and clarity, product build quality, keyboard functionality, ...)
  • Core Functionality (messaging, voice, browsing, media playing, ...)
  • Robustness (call quality, ease of navigation, ...)
  • Utility (ability to meet current needs, and to extend base functionality to meet potential needs, connect to others, ...)
  • Battery Life (or frequency with which you have to re-charge your phone, ...)
  • Availability of Help/Support (from the manufacturer or others)
  • Cost

In my estimation, in the TXI there is not a single parameter which will clearly differentiate one smartphone over the others. In addition, the scale will vary depending on an individual person's smartphone use paradigm. It is the intertwining of the parameters in the context of an individual's use paradigm that will tip the scales in favour of one product over the other and seal a decision to purchase. Consider the Core Functionality parameter. I believe that for most smartphones this is a pretty much a dead heat. There are definitely different ways of implementing these core functions, but, by and large, they accomplish similar things, and virtually all platforms can do them and do them well. Consider, however, how Core Functionality can mix and match with Utility to create a greater experience. Combine GPS capability with Core Functionality's image browsing capability and we have an enhanced experience. How seamless and effortless it is to access and use this enhanced experience is also a factor.

So, if you're with me, and can accept that there might be something to this TXI notion, then let's consider this first on a platform basis (in a second column I will explore this on a particular handset basis). Here's how I see the various platforms currently situated with respect to overall market positioning, and trending, amongst consumers (as I see them) with a generalized use paradigm, on a TXI scale:

  • Apple iPhone - the highest TXI value and rising, although rising slower than a year ago
  • Android - the second highest TXI value, and rising the most quickly
  • RIM BlackBerry - middle ground TXI value, and moving horizontally
  • Symbian - middle ground TXI value, and moving downward
  • Windows Mobile - bottom half, and moving downward
  • Windows Phone 7 - just entering the chart, and starting to move up
  • MeeGo - just entering the chart, and starting to move up

We all know that a tremendous number of people are purchasing iPhones. Lots more are purchasing Android devices. Why are they purchasing phones from these platforms? It can't be because phones based on these platforms have the most features, since that honor would probably have to go to smartphones based on the Windows Mobile platform (the current platform, not the forthcoming Windows Phone 7 platform). So, if it's not the total number of features, then why do you talk to so many people that purchase these particular phones and then comment that they absolutely love the smartphone platform they are using? I think it's because of the positioning of the product in that person's TXI

Apple, and its iPhone platform, are a very interesting study in the TXI. In my opinion they have really mastered the intertwining of the parameters in ways that others have not been able to yet. How many people do you know that revel in their use of their iPhone (or other Apple products, for that matter). There is something about their experience that "delights" them in profound ways. It's not one factor, it's the total experience. "Seamless", "of high aesthetic appeal", "intuitive", are all words that flow from people that use these products. This has not happened by chance, it has been designed that way, and is supported by strong marketing with key messaging.

So, where does this leave Windows Phone 7? As can been seen in my placement of Windows Phone 7 on my fictitious TXI scale, it's really too early to draw a lot of conclusions. That being said, my impression based on my readings of the experiences people have had so far with the platform, is that it has very good TXI potential. There are many reports, some anecdotal, from those people that have used one that suggest they are delighted by the intertwining of TXI parameters that Microsoft and the handset manufacturers have been able to achieve. In particular, the overall aesthetic appearance and feel, and the core functionality parameters seem to show promise. But as we have seen, TXI is complicated, and whether Microsoft and their partner's work in the other areas will be sufficient for the platform to climb the index and challenge Apple iPhone and Android is not a given. Only time will tell, and recently internal turmoil inside Microsoft suggests not everyone is pulling in the same direction to make this happen.

Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 09:20 PM
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 24

You can't seriously put Android in the same league with the iPhone in terms of overall experience. It's a very strong platform with great dynamics and so on, but it has tons of problems in the experience department - UI inconsistencies, cryptic message boxes, OEM customizations, some outright crappy devices, horrible quality of many applications in the Market etc. etc.

It's not successful without a reason, but flawless user experience isn't one of them.
Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2010, 10:20 PM
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 251

> It's not successful without a reason, but flawless user experience isn't one of them.

I think the point here is TXI--not being flawless. Every platform listed, including the unreleased WP7, has its flaws. We live with the flaws (either design or implementation flaws). Its the TXI; the things that do work well for an individual that sell a device to that individual.

For example, I see firsthand that apps in Android market are lacking in some areas (can't find financial apps with equivalent features found on WM6.x apps). But that doesn't mean the entire Android effort is unappealing for me. In fact, it seems to have greater appeal right now, and is increasing.

I saw the exact same situation for myself when i switched from Apple Newton to Microsoft PocketPC. It didn't take long (2 or 3 years) for apps (and OS) to mature.

Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 07:24 AM
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 24

Well, it is certainly maturing and developing and all that, but that's about functionality.

What I'm talking about is aesthetics, ease of navigation, battery life and other things that make the TXI. Android is just a class lower. It looks and feels like beta software, like almost everything Google does. This beta software may work great, but it's perpetually unfinished.
Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2010, 10:51 PM
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 251

I understand. Those are important parts of the experience that Google (and Microsoft) need to improve on. In this particular case, my opinion is that the aesthetics, ease of navigation, and battery life have resulted in an excellent experience for me as compared to WM6.5. That's with only one month using a Nexus One (stock Google rom) and 18 months previous using an HTC Fuze (stock and WM6.5.x roms). TXI obviously has to be considered across all users in a market, not just one individual.

To me it looks more like a perpetually improving product. Brad Wasson, and what looks like a few others, see it as a rival for top position.

It won't be too many more months before we can make a fair judgement on where Microsoft has taken WP7. Until I see its UI in action on production hardware I am taking the critical stance that it is too extreme in its Metro style--but perhaps it will impress...

Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2010, 12:10 PM
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 175

There are two things that decides if any gadget will be successfull: What does your friends have and advertising, nothing else matters to any one but us geeks, gadget freaks and new addaptors.

If your friends have Iphones and are showing off with them, then that's what you are going to buy, if they are very pleased with their Android phones you'll want one of those.

If all you see in the comercial breaks are Nokia phones, then you'll most likely look for one of those first, and most of your friends will have them as well, untill one of them shows up with some thing else, that is better at Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and/or gaming experience.

The largest consumer group in the cell/smart phone market are not any of us, but teens and tweens who could care less about the phone, as long as it does texting, music and video well, and has THE killer app of the day, oh, and looks the most flashy ofcourse.

Iphone is doing very well because its the most Bling at the moment, and because it's all over the news, when was the last time you saw CNN repport on a new Windows phone? 75%+ of the end users could care less about if it does multitasking, copy/paste or Excell, they never use it any way.
Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2010, 06:32 PM
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4

Originally Posted by TOCA View Post
Iphone is doing very well because its the most Bling at the moment, and because it's all over the news, when was the last time you saw CNN repport on a new Windows phone? ...
In the most recent episode of The Mentalist, there were at least two scenes where they used a WinPhone7 device. In one scene, they also said they would "Bing" for some information (instead of Googling it).

Product placement is happening. I can almost feel my total experience indexing!
Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:19 AM.