¹ Universal Could Take a Bite Out of Apple - Thoughts Media Forums Zune Thoughts

Zune Thoughts.com

Thanks for visiting Zune Thoughts - be sure to register in our forums!


Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Windows Phone Thoughts

Loading feed...

Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > ZUNE THOUGHTS > Zune Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-18-2007, 02:00 PM
Darius Wey
Developer & Designer, News Editor Emeritus
Darius Wey's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 12,959
Default Universal Could Take a Bite Out of Apple

http://tinyurl.com/2wnt2o

"Other recording companies have yet to follow Universal's hard-line lead, particularly in suing online video and social networking sites. They appear happy to let Morris carry the fight through lawsuits and other measures. In his tussle with YouTube, Morris called the site a hub for pirated music videos and negotiated a licensing deal that landed Universal and other labels small stakes in the company just before it was acquired by Google for $1.76 billion US last year. Morris has already suggested, albeit guardedly, that his next target will be iPod-maker and No. 1 online music retailer Apple Inc. With Apple's licensing deal to sell Universal music on iTunes set to expire in May, Morris said, "there might be other ways to get paid." Last fall, Morris threatened not to license Universal music to Microsoft just days before it was scheduled to launch its own online music store and its Zune digital music player. In response, the software company coughed up a royalty of just over a dollar for every Zune sold and paid music fees."

Whether you like it or not (chances are, you don't), Universal is on a mission to milk everything for what it's worth. Zune, of course, fell victim to the label's strong-arm tactics late last year, and come May, the iPod could be next. And beyond? Only time will tell.
__________________
Want the latest news, views, rants and raves? Visit our portal. Wish to contact me? Send me a private message or e-mail.
 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-18-2007, 02:34 PM
Vincent M Ferrari
Sage
Vincent M Ferrari's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 797
Send a message via ICQ to Vincent M Ferrari Send a message via AIM to Vincent M Ferrari Send a message via Skype™ to Vincent M Ferrari

The Zune fell victim to Microsoft poisoning the waters for the competition, plain and simple. I hope Apple tells 'em to shove it right along with their "you're a pirate because you own a portable audio player" tax.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-18-2007, 03:54 PM
Sage
Ponderer
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 52

The major music labels are greedy, arrogant and Ludditian. I can't wait for the day when the internet allows small labels and bands to thrive without the need for Universal's PR and distrubition clout.

Last edited by Sage; 01-18-2007 at 03:56 PM..
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-18-2007, 07:06 PM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent M Ferrari View Post
The Zune fell victim to Microsoft poisoning the waters for the competition, plain and simple.
What the heck does that mean? Please expand upon this concept...
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-18-2007, 07:38 PM
Vincent M Ferrari
Sage
Vincent M Ferrari's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 797
Send a message via ICQ to Vincent M Ferrari Send a message via AIM to Vincent M Ferrari Send a message via Skype™ to Vincent M Ferrari

Unless I'm completely wrong and somehow a music company managed to bring a company with 85% of the OS market share to its knees, Microsoft gave in to Universal with their per-device fee in order to make it more expensive for the people they're competing against to carry Universal's music.

It's not such a wacky theory and frankly it explains a lot, namely why any company would automatically go along with this "piracy tax."
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-18-2007, 07:58 PM
kryptman40k
Pupil
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 16

I think people are making a big deal out of very little. I mean, if you knew where most of your dollars went when you bought a hamburger you probably wouldn't be that happy about it either.

So universal gets a dollar out of my zune. Good for them. They haven't made a doller out of me in a good 15 years because they don't put out decent music.

Lots of companies strike deals to cut into the profits of others, thats just how our amazing system works.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-18-2007, 08:05 PM
David Tucker
Contributing Editor Emeritus
David Tucker's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,053
Send a message via ICQ to David Tucker Send a message via AIM to David Tucker Send a message via MSN to David Tucker Send a message via Yahoo to David Tucker

And I'm sure the fight that MS wanted to ahve on its hands the moment the Zune launched was with the RIAA to get content on its device. Universal has been trying to do this to Apple for a long time.
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-18-2007, 08:16 PM
rohitharsh
Pupil
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 10
Default MS did the right thing

First of all MS did the right thing by paying the Universal at that moment. This is not a school fight where you act on emotion. At the time MS needed Universal so they went ahead with the deal. In future MS will expect something back from them.
As Bryan Lee said “"We went to them when we started up with the Zune and said, 'We can do this to you, or we can do this with you. We want to do it with you,'" Lee said.”
In business you do not start a confrontation from the word go. In case by paying $1 to Universal if MS does get a better deal where they get exclusive content then it will be worth it. Or if they get the Universal to relax the 3 day 3 play rule (as speculation suggest), then again it will be worth it.
However in the end if MS feels that Universal is not following the line and are being too restrictive as then Bryan Lee said “We can do this to you”.
Give it time and let’s see how it plays out.
Bryan Lee article:
http://blogs.chron.com/techblog/arch..._the_zune.html

Last edited by rohitharsh; 01-18-2007 at 08:17 PM.. Reason: MS Word mark up
 
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-18-2007, 09:08 PM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent M Ferrari View Post
Unless I'm completely wrong and somehow a music company managed to bring a company with 85% of the OS market share to its knees, Microsoft gave in to Universal with their per-device fee in order to make it more expensive for the people they're competing against to carry Universal's music.
That's one theory, but how about this one: the Zune is an underdog in a fairly mature market massively dominated by an entrenched player, and they needed Universal and their music catalogue more than Universal needed the Zune Marketplace as a revenue generator for their music. In fact, Universal probably couldn't give a crap about the Zune because they know it will take years before the Zune is selling in significant numbers that Universal would be losing out on any significant revenue opportunities.

Don't get me wrong, I'm ticked off at the idea that I'm a music pirate because I bought a Zune, but from a business standpoint, how much WORSE would the reviews of the Zune be if the Zune Marketplace didn't have any music from Universal's catalogue? You know full well the reviews would have been even worse, slamming the Zune Marketplace for lacking music from one of the biggest players in this arena. People are always slamming the Zune Marketplace because it only has 2 million tracks instead of the 3.5 million that iTunes has (or whatever).

Also, we have to keep this in perspective - if Microsoft hits their goal of selling 1 million units this year, that's only $1 million it's going to cost them. That's not a big sacrifice for the Zune team to make in order to get access to popular music they needed.
 
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-19-2007, 03:20 AM
Janak Parekh
Editor Emeritus
Janak Parekh's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 15,171

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Dunn View Post
Also, we have to keep this in perspective - if Microsoft hits their goal of selling 1 million units this year, that's only $1 million it's going to cost them. That's not a big sacrifice for the Zune team to make in order to get access to popular music they needed.
Your points are all very true, and yet, one can't help but wonder if Microsoft made a "deal with the Devil", so to speak... and will that hurt them, and possibly everyone else, later down the road?

Interestingly, this ties into Damion's latest post about Microsoft ditching PFS. One thing I don't get is that they had Universal on board on the PFS stores, including URGE, right? So if Microsoft actually just evolved their PFS ecosystem slightly, they wouldn't have gotten stuck between a rock and Universal... instead, they tied consumers in, but also locked themselves into a lose-lose negotiation strategy.

--janak
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
All That Apple Stuff Today... Jason Dunn Digital Home Talk 41 01-17-2008 04:23 AM
Apple TV Guide about Video/DVD Conversion & ports drcshine Digital Home Software 9 04-13-2007 03:54 AM
Universal Gets a Cut of Zune Sales Darius Wey Zune Talk 5 11-09-2006 10:34 PM
Apple Unveils Front Row, and iYawn... Jason Dunn Digital Home Talk 9 10-15-2005 08:55 AM
iLife '04 Retrospective Kent Pribbernow Digital Home Software 9 01-24-2005 08:02 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:58 PM.