¹ Zune vs iPod Video Comparison - Thoughts Media Forums Zune Thoughts

Zune Thoughts.com

Thanks for visiting Zune Thoughts - be sure to register in our forums!


Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Windows Phone Thoughts

Loading feed...

Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > ZUNE THOUGHTS > Zune News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-08-2008, 05:15 AM
David Tucker
Contributing Editor Emeritus
David Tucker's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,053
Send a message via ICQ to David Tucker Send a message via AIM to David Tucker Send a message via MSN to David Tucker Send a message via Yahoo to David Tucker
Default Zune vs iPod Video Comparison

Got Zune? did a video comparison of the Zune 80 vs iPod Classic the other day and I have to say I was very surprised at the result. The iPod was clearly washed out while sitting next to the Zune. I had never seen the iPod used for video really and always assumed the screen quality was really quite similar to the Zune. To see that the Zune is quite a bit better when it comes to video in both screen size and display quality is very interesting. If it comes up in a conversation now where someone is asking for advice on media players and video is important to them then I would be much more strongly in favor of a Zune now. (Not that I wouldn't be in favor of one but not everyone's needs are the same!) 

 
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-08-2008, 01:55 PM
Stinger
Thinker
Stinger's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 471

I think anyone serious about video would go for the iPod touch rather than the iPod classic. The 32GB limit is a bit of a pain but the size of the screen makes up for it.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-08-2008, 02:21 PM
David Tucker
Contributing Editor Emeritus
David Tucker's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,053
Send a message via ICQ to David Tucker Send a message via AIM to David Tucker Send a message via MSN to David Tucker Send a message via Yahoo to David Tucker

Not that many people are willing to drop $500 on a video player
 
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-08-2008, 09:58 PM
Rocco Augusto
Editor Emeritus
Rocco Augusto's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,432

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Tucker View Post
Not that many people are willing to drop $500 on a video player
I dropped $500 on a video player... but it was a home theater pc which does way more than an iPod Touch can do! I guess that doesn't count, huh?
__________________
Follow me on Twitter - @therocco
 
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-09-2008, 02:22 AM
Stinger
Thinker
Stinger's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 471

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Tucker View Post
Not that many people are willing to drop $500 on a video player
Enough people to get it to number 4 on Amazon's top mp3 players list.
 
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-10-2008, 03:56 PM
Macguy59
Mystic
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,608

Well gee let's compare the video quality of a BlackJack II versus the iPhone. This comparison would still be valid had the 'Touch not been introduced. The 'Touch is the better comparison now in terms of screen size and quality.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-10-2008, 06:42 PM
David Tucker
Contributing Editor Emeritus
David Tucker's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,053
Send a message via ICQ to David Tucker Send a message via AIM to David Tucker Send a message via MSN to David Tucker Send a message via Yahoo to David Tucker

Quote:
Originally Posted by byteme View Post
Well gee let's compare the video quality of a BlackJack II versus the iPhone. This comparison would still be valid had the 'Touch not been introduced. The 'Touch is the better comparison now in terms of screen size and quality.
I don't quite understand what you mean here.

Anyway, my point was that if you're in the market for a $250 MP3 player...comparing it to one that's twice the cost seems a bit meaningless
 
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-10-2008, 10:24 PM
Jason Dunn
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,160

Quote:
Originally Posted by byteme View Post
The 'Touch is the better comparison now in terms of screen size and quality.
Really? The Zune 80 and iPod Classic are both hard drive-based, both have the same resolution (320 x 240), both are $249 MSRP, and both are nearly the same size. They're pretty much tailor-made for comparisons. The only major difference is the screen size of the Zune being bigger.

The Touch on the other hand is flash-based, has a larger screen, a higher resolution screen, and is at least $50 to $250 more depending on capacity. There's no Zune that competes with it.

If someone wants a media player and they have a $500 budget, I think the Touch is the best way to go. But if they have $250 and they want 80 GB of storage, the Zune is a strong contender over the iPod Classic.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:22 PM.