Zune Thoughts

Zune Thoughts.com

Thanks for visiting Zune Thoughts - be sure to register in our forums!


Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Windows Phone Thoughts

Loading feed...

Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > ZUNE THOUGHTS > Zune Hardware

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2009, 06:02 AM
Contributing Editor Emeritus
David Tucker's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,052
Send a message via ICQ to David Tucker Send a message via AIM to David Tucker Send a message via MSN to David Tucker Send a message via Yahoo to David Tucker

I will do that comparison...though it may take me a bit before I manage it.
 
Reply With Quote
  #42 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2009, 02:41 PM
Oracle
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 984

That actually is something else that I do: my main library is (mostly) 320 kbps MP3 files (the files that I ripped from my CDs), plus the 256 kbps MP3s and AACs bought from Amazon and iTunes (not really many of those), but nearly everything on my iPod library has been transcoded down to 128 kbps AAC files. I have done those listening tests, and with all but classical music with a lot of dynamic range, there is really no noticeable difference when wearing any sort of earbuds or headphones. And, considering the fact that I do a majority of listening to my iPod while I'm doing something else - running, cutting the grass, doing other outdoor chores - it really doesn't make that much of a difference. YMMV, of course.

And, by the way, when I say to somebody with 30 GB of music who also wants to carry a handful of video and numerous podcasts on their device that my argument to him that a 32 GB Zune should be ok, I think that is a reasonable suggestion. Please don't tell me that I shouldn't make that argument. You may certainly disagree, but I think I'm entitled to at least throw that out there in this particular case, yes?

Last edited by doogald; 09-03-2009 at 05:00 PM.. Reason: replaced 32 kbps with 320
 
Reply With Quote
  #43 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2009, 03:50 PM
Contributing Editor Emeritus
David Tucker's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,052
Send a message via ICQ to David Tucker Send a message via AIM to David Tucker Send a message via MSN to David Tucker Send a message via Yahoo to David Tucker

Please tell me that the 32 kbps is a typo for 320 kbps!
 
Reply With Quote
  #44 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2009, 04:58 PM
Oracle
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 984

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Tucker View Post
Please tell me that the 32 kbps is a typo for 320 kbps!
'Tis. (message must be ten characters, so I have added this parenthetical message.)
 
Reply With Quote
  #45 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2009, 11:37 PM
Pontificator
Kacey Green's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,097

Jason, two things: I'm already doing that with my full 120, I left it to sync this morning after de-selecting some more artists to make everything fit, and it added over 160 new items to the device, (despite my not adding any new content and only de-rating stuff I wanted to take off) I may drop the quality another notch .

Point two: I see the kinds of crazy comments you get on YouTube, yikes.
__________________
Please see www.grlt.com "Tech with a twist of lime!"
The Midlands Hybrid Club MidlandsHybrid.com
Current: Kacey's Wing, T-mo Wing Past: GCM_T, T-Mobile MDA
 
Reply With Quote
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 09-03-2009, 11:47 PM
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,135

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kacey Green View Post
Point two: I see the kinds of crazy comments you get on YouTube, yikes.
Hehe...you have no idea! I delete all the really bad ones.
__________________
Want to contact me personally? Use this. Want to read my personal blog? Check it out. Want to follow me on Twitter? Here you go.
 
Reply With Quote
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-2009, 12:49 PM
Intellectual
stlbud's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 236

Quote:
Originally Posted by doogald View Post
...Please don't tell me that I shouldn't make that argument. You may certainly disagree, but I think I'm entitled to at least throw that out there in this particular case, yes?
I suppose that is an alternative. At first I was thinking the time to transcode would be prohibitive but then I remember that I sync and charge my Zune overnight. I wouldn't even be conscious 8-) I'd still have to see if it shrinks down enough.

Even still, it kind of takes the value of "HD" out of the equation. Specially when you have HDMI and Optical SPDIF out.

From the Wizard of Oz ... "My world! My Beautiful World! Shrinking! Shrinking..."
__________________
Bill B

Zune Tag - therealstlbud

Last edited by stlbud; 09-04-2009 at 12:55 PM..
 
Reply With Quote
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-2009, 10:57 PM
Ponderer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 67

Quote:
Originally Posted by doogald View Post
And, by the way, when I say to somebody with 30 GB of music who also wants to carry a handful of video and numerous podcasts on their device that my argument to him that a 32 GB Zune should be ok, I think that is a reasonable suggestion. Please don't tell me that I shouldn't make that argument. You may certainly disagree, but I think I'm entitled to at least throw that out there in this particular case, yes?
I disagree!
 
Reply With Quote
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 09-04-2009, 11:16 PM
Ponderer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 67
Default I did that test

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Dunn View Post
Do a test: transcode to 160 kbps WMA or even 128 kbps WMA and see how much (if any) of a difference that you notice...
I did that test ages ago. I can easily hear the differences. Of course each persons hearing can vary. And it depends on how well you've take care of your ears, ie. loud levels. Plus it depends on how you listen to music. A professional recording engineer/producer or musician probably listens differently and more critically. All my music except that from Amazon is recorded at the highest bitrates. If I had room on my Zune, I'd probably use lossless or at least OGG if it were an option. Yes, I use professional earphones.

Paul
 
Reply With Quote
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 09-05-2009, 06:44 PM
Neophyte
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1
Default Good Move by MSFT

I don't know what the problem is. Microsoft is going full tilt with HD. It doesn't make sense to maintain the other models. You have a good sized unit that can play music, video and hopefully games in the future. The other models are no longer relevant and I certainly wouldn't recommend them since the the new HD is on its way.

For those of you hoping for more space, just wait. Obviously larger drives will be on there way. You already know that a 64 gb is in the works and they'll probably double that by the end of 2010 if not earlier.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://forums.thoughtsmedia.com/f9/zune-retire-every-player-but-zune-hd-94994.html
Posted By For Type Date
404 Not Found This thread Refback 12-01-2009 10:12 AM
404 Not Found This thread Refback 11-15-2009 04:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:46 PM.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0