|
I disagree
It is symbolism, yes, but not in a shallow way - those (like me) who believe that in this day and age we can't continue to ignore other humans dying simply because they had the misfortune (?) of being born in an extremely poot country have voiced our opinions in a direct and specific way. That is not an option at general elections - you can never know why a party got voted into power.
I agree with the thoughts on making sure that the "extra money" these countries will have reaches the places it needs to, and I'm not niaive enough to think that all of it will, but that is out of our hands.
Cancelling debt is only on offer for those countries that meet certain criteria on good governance and tackling corruption. Measuring those things is another matter, but nobody said this was going to be easy.
As for getting involved first hand, well that's a grand idea, but frankly I don't get to spend enough time with my own son, and time is more precious than money to me. Our governments and other bodies are employed to do these things for us - to represent us, and in this case to represent our desire to see a more equitable system.
It seems to me that money can't solve (m)any problems, it only ever seems to be the cause of them, but I can't see how Live8 and the debt relief can be a bad thing.
Just my 2p
|