
07-27-2005, 06:00 PM
|
|
Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,245
|
|
The Motorola Q vs. the Treo 650
"By request, the new Motorola Q Smartphone side-by-side with the Treo 650." Well here they are side by side. I don't know about you but that landscape screen on the Q just doesn't look right. Another thing is how can a screen that big not be a touch screen? Of course none of this will matter because we all know the day it hits the shelves we will be on here saying which stores it is available in and how much we spent. :lol:
__________________
[Q 9h] [iPhone (16gb)] [att Tilt]
[EOS-1D MarkIII] [SD990 IS]
Flickr
|
| |
|
|
|

07-27-2005, 06:23 PM
|
|
Thinker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 396
|
|
Too wide.
|
| |
|
|
|

07-27-2005, 06:49 PM
|
|
Pupil
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 32
|
|
Quote:
|
Another thing is how can a screen that big not be a touch screen?
|
Very well, thank you. You don't have to protect a normal screen as much as you do a touchscreen. The Q should be pocketable. The Treo is not without a hard case to protect the touchscreen.
... and then you have to put a screen scratch protector on it too, and hope you got it on right so the digitizer works OK, and then you have to poke at the screen occasionally (though the Treo is very good at one-handed navigation). No thanks. I like my Smartphone 
|
| |
|
|
|

07-27-2005, 07:12 PM
|
|
Contributing Editor
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 14,940
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mbranscum
Too wide.
|
It does look narrower than the Blackberries it's supposed to compete against, though. A narrower device would have a more cramped thumbboard.
--janak
|
| |
|
|
|

07-27-2005, 07:12 PM
|
|
Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 11,180
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mbranscum
Too wide.
|
I'm not too sure about that. It is wider than the Treo, but only by a little amount. It actually looks like a pretty decent size all around. I wouldn't complain if it was smaller, but for a Smartphone with a built in keyboard - I think it's a great size and a nice looker.
__________________
"I have no special talents, I am only passionately curious" - Albert Einstein
|
| |
|
|
|

07-27-2005, 07:20 PM
|
|
Thinker
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 396
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Mike Temporale
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mbranscum
Too wide.
|
I'm not too sure about that. It is wider than the Treo, but only by a little amount. It actually looks like a pretty decent size all around. I wouldn't complain if it was smaller, but for a Smartphone with a built in keyboard - I think it's a great size and a nice looker.
|
This thing looks as wide and tall as the HP6315. If it was a full Pocket PC that would be one thing, but as a Smartphone??? I'm not sure. I've carried a Treo and this thing looks too big.
|
| |
|
|
|

07-27-2005, 07:54 PM
|
|
Neophyte
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1
|
|
Treo 650: 4.4" x 2.3" x 0.9" - weight: 178g
Motorola Q: 4.4" x 2.51" x 0.5" - weight: 115g
Blackberry 7230: 4.5" x 2.9" x 0.8" - weight : 136g
Definitely a bit wider - could be significant. But check out the weight and thinness difference. Probably makes up for the width. Certainly it won't be like my Blackberry (which feel like I'm talking to a plank of wood).
My questions is this: what's with all the wasted space between the bottom and the keyboard - Treo just seems better designed from that standpoint.
|
| |
|
|
|

07-27-2005, 08:42 PM
|
|
Contributing Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,052
|
|
To me, this thing is obviously trying to compete with the blackberry, not the treo. This was even more clear to me this morning when I saw someone's blackberry with its horizontal non-touch screen. All this Q needs is a scroll wheel and tetris.
Besides, the treo is an actual PDA, wheras the blackberry is really a communications device with added functionality, much like a smartphone.
I think this would be close to the perfect smartphone for me... I can't wait!
|
| |
|
|
|

07-27-2005, 09:46 PM
|
|
Pontificator
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,486
|
|
If they got rid of that space at the bottom, I could comprehend it.
Visually, the treo wins with the larger screen.
I'm going to pass on this one I think. Give me GPS. Give me WiFi.
__________________
[placeholder for approved signature]
|
| |
|
|
|

07-27-2005, 10:23 PM
|
|
Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 6,245
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by chandler
Quote:
|
Another thing is how can a screen that big not be a touch screen?
|
Very well, thank you. You don't have to protect a normal screen as much as you do a touchscreen. The Q should be pocketable. The Treo is not without a hard case to protect the touchscreen.
... and then you have to put a screen scratch protector on it too, and hope you got it on right so the digitizer works OK, and then you have to poke at the screen occasionally (though the Treo is very good at one-handed navigation). No thanks. I like my Smartphone 
|
I must disagree. I carry my iPAQ in just about everything with a screen protector, no hard case, no problems. I would also think there would be a way to lock the screen just like we do with phone keypads now. You can't tell me in 2005 we cant have a touch screen phone!
__________________
[Q 9h] [iPhone (16gb)] [att Tilt]
[EOS-1D MarkIII] [SD990 IS]
Flickr
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|