Thoughts Media.com

 




  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-09-2004, 12:00 AM
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,595
Default Voice Over IP - A First Hand Perspective

http://www.devbuzz.com/content/vonage_voice_over_ip_pg1.asp

My friend Derek Mitchell over at dEVbuzz has written up a first-hand perspective of using the Vonage VOIP kit. I've always been curious about VOIP, but I don't do all that much long distance calling so I haven't looked into it. Curious about VOIP and the benefits? Check out Derek's article!
 
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-09-2004, 12:18 AM
Theorist
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 263

I've had similar experiences with Packet8 (http://www.packet8.net/). I've been using their VoIP service for 3 months now and mostly like it. Here's my story:

I needed a new phone number to use exclusively for business in my home and didn't want to pay the almost $40 per month the phone company wanted to charge (long distance is on top of that). Also, though I don't get reimbursed for business calls as much as I should, not paying for long distance appealed to me. VoIP seemed like a decent option for what I was looking for. I get a local phone number and don't pay any long distance, all for only $19.95 per month. Sure, there is no 911 service but I have a regular home phone as well as 3 cell phones in our family so no major loss there. The Packet 8 system is similar to Vonage - you get an adapter to plug into your switch and then you plug a regular phone into that.

After three months of extensive use, I find it to be mostly reliable. The call quality is good unless I'm uploading something or downloading a large file (I use cable). In a few cases I've had to use my home phone as a backup but 98% of the time it works fine. In May I spoke for over 5.5 hours total and didn't pay for any long distance. I'm probably saving around $45 a month over my phone company.

The only other downside has been some occassional downtime. Every once in a while (rarely) I pick the phone up and there is no dialtone, requiring me to hard-reset (power off) the Packet 8 adapter. A minor inconvenience, really.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-09-2004, 02:24 PM
Pontificator
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,200

Interesting Sundown. Could you be more specific about the 2% of the time you can't use the service? Is it poor sound? No dial tone? Missed calls? What's a user that used to 99.9999% performance from their exisitng landline service likely to give up for the cost savings?
 
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-09-2004, 07:42 PM
Theorist
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 263

Downtime for me is when I pick up the phone and there is no dialtone OR I don't even try because I'm uploading or downloading a large file. I wouldn't totally replace my land line with this system if I often made a lot of calls. I personally might consider it, though, because I don't make many calls except for business and I do have a cell phone as a backup. Like I said, these minor inconveniences are worth it to me based on value. I pay less than 1/3rd of what I would probably pay for another land line.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7
Copyright Thoughts Media Inc. 2007