Ipod or Ipaq?

[jbachandouris]

I am interested in an MP3 player, and no, just like my Ipaq, I don't 'need' one. There are many players out there would any of you recommend an SD card for my Ipaq 4155 or a standalone player?

Stand alones: Ipod, Iriver, and Dell's player?

Whatever happened to HP making an Ipod? I read the article, but I haven't seen any?

[jbachandouris]

I am interested in an MP3 player, and no, just like my Ipaq, I don't 'need' one. There are many players out there would any of you recommend an SD card for my Ipaq 4155 or a standalone player?

Stand alones: Ipod, Iriver, and Dell's player?

Whatever happened to HP making an Ipod? I read the article, but I haven't seen any?

[OSUKid7]

So what's your question?? The subject's a little confusing.

[jbachandouris]

The question is stand alone MP# player of Ipaq with SD card.

If stand alone, then which one?

[upplepop]

I recommend using your PDA as your mp3 player... it's fewer devices that you have to maintain and carry around. I'm all about minimalism!
However, there are many reasons you would want to get a dedicated mp3 player; the two biggest ones are that (1) it is (probably) smaller, and (2) the ones you list have more memory than any current SD card. It's really up to you and your listening habits.

As for a recommendation to a mp3 player, try looking into the Archos line of mp3 players. I find them to be much more of a value than the iPod.

[Don't Panic!]

iPOD or Windows based MP3 player for quantity, iPAQ and memory card for quality and functions.

HTH

Don't Panic!
Bobby

[Gremmie]

Originally Posted by Don't Panic!

iPOD or Windows based MP3 player for quantity, iPAQ and memory card for quality and functions.

Why only quality on the iPAQ? The iPOD has plenty of room for large quality. Don't forget, beyond 128kbps, increasing the quality doesn't matter as much.

I'd say iPOD. Trying to control your music through software can be annoying. Transferring music is quicker with the iPOD unless you want to buy a card reader. iPAQ can do more, but would you use it?

A PDA isn't minimalistic if you're only going to listen to music--just more confusing.

[Janak Parekh]

Originally Posted by Gremmie

Why only quality on the iPAQ? The iPOD has plenty of room for large quality. Don't forget, beyond 128kbps, increasing the quality doesn't matter as much.

I've used both, and I think the iPAQ's audio circuitry is slightly better. Plus you can have a custom EQ.

I'd say iPOD. Trying to control your music through software can be annoying. Transferring music is quicker with the iPOD unless you want to buy a card reader. iPAQ can do more, but would you use it?

That's the key question. I personally carry both, because the capacity of an iPod is critical for me.

--janak

[Zack Mahdavi]

I carry both as well. I like my iPaq for music because you can sit somewhere in campus and tune in to your favorite internet radio station with WiFi. I use the iPod, however, for all other times. It has a much longer battery life, and it's much easier to transfer music to an iPod then it is for an iPaq.

So my opinion is... if you want to get an iPaq mainly for music and nothing else, then go for the iPod instead. You'll definitely use it more...

[SHC]

I use my 2210 with large CF cards, I did have a ZEN jukebox but the iPAQ sound was better. If you can only use SD cards then I'd go for an iRIVER, better build, better sound and better battery life than an iPOD and usually cheaper too.
There is also the debate about WMA files being of better quality than MP3 files, and the iPOD cant use WMA.

[jbachandouris]

I already own an Ipaq 4455. So the reason I asked the questions was to decide on if it would be worth it to buy a memory card for MP3 purposes. Perhaps a better question would have been memory card or MP3 player?

But, from what has been posted so far the Ipod is the recommended MP3 player? I realize the Nomad series are cheaper, but they're huge.