
09-01-2003, 06:00 PM
|
|
Pupil
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 24
|
|
I don't see this announcement as necessarily a negative commentary on Symbian or a positive endorsement of MS Smartphone.  Rather, I think it's another case of an OS licensee thinking they'll save money by moving to a "free" OS.
They'll probably find out, like many others, that moving to embedded Linux is not more cost effective, but it may give them the ability to make custom changes which may have some added value.  They will also gain some flexibility in dealing with the specific OS vendors and in contracting out some production.
The larger issue is that Motorola is shifting to an OS agnostic approach, and concentrating on the Java VM as its centralizing technology.  The effect is to spread their resource allocation among vendors supporting a Java runtime.  Worst case scenario, if Motorola's Linux phone fails, they can simply move their interest back to Symbian because of its support for Java.
If MS Smartphone does not include a Java runtime, they'll be missing a major opportunity to gain marketshare from a major cellphone manufacturer who is actively seeking expenditure in other smartphone operating systems.
|
| |
|
|
|