
05-23-2003, 11:42 PM
|
|
Thinker
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 384
|
|
Doomed vs Anchoring yourself to doomed
I think the author kinda misses the whole point.
I think it's great that he chooses Netscape when the rest of the world has virtually abandoned it. BUT, thats the point is that Palm is trying to appeal to a VERY wide audience.
Palm anchoring itself to Netscape would cause far more problems than it's worth. This guy can just as well invest in a different syncing product or move his contacts to something that is compatible with the Microsoft Contact Base (which ISN'T outlook).
If this guy was as big of a rebel as he makes out (by using Netscape), well, he'd be using a Mac and their STANDARD calendaring software.
Palm's biggest problems was really their "head in the sand" attitude to technology and it's business model. I think they've fixed those problems. Their alliance with Sony have produced the most advanced palmtops available (The high end Clies kick EVERYBODIES butt!!!!!)
Palm still owns the Lion's share of the handheld market. They have done MUCH BETTER than PocketPC in phone integration. They have a MUCH LARGER enterprise presence.
Microsoft still has an uphill battle to crush Palm the way they crushed Netscape. Though, with Sony on Palms side, I don't think it will be a much tougher battle than with Netscape. Sony has a retail presence all over the world that makes it the KING of consumer electronics.
Microsoft needs to enable PocketPC devices up to 640x480 sometime this year. Call them PocketPC-HD if you have to (though abandoning the low end market would be a mistake). All indications are that it WON'T happen in July. I believe the lack of High-Res screen will kill PocketPCs technology edge and swing momentum back to PalmSoft and Sony.
Handhelds are still an emerging market. Their are loads of new consumers out their who haven't yet discovered the utility of a palmtop computer (the truly PERSONAL computer). The one who can garner the MOST NEW USERS(not use uber-geeks) will likely gain the upper hand.
|
| |
|
|
|