
10-21-2003, 01:00 AM
|
|
Neophyte
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1
|
|
Not the 5455's problem....
This is a fairly well-kept secret among the public, but is generally well-known by those who follow trends with Cisco (aka Linksys) routers. Seems the FCC had a problem with Linksys' "Signal Booster" product, which was orginally intended just to be used to boost the signals on Linksys routers, but which had antenna connectors which allowed them to be used on virtually any model router. Without going into all of the technical aspects of why the FCC would/should care about signal strength for unlicensed private radios, let's just say they care greatly, and this summer, Linksys was required to pull the product off the shelves completely.
The FCC and Linksys reached a compromise which has allowed Linksys to resume marketing the Signal Booster product (they are still selling old inventory now, but with a warning that the device is only designed to work with Linksys products....it will still work with other products in the real world). But the newly manufactured items will indeed only work with Linksys products, which are supposed to feature different and proprietary antenna connectors.
So what does this have to do with signal strength on a Linksys router? Well, it seems that Linksys has been rumored to be quietly have lowered the effective power of their router radios as well (perhaps as a means of boosting the sales of their own proprietary Signal Booster products....nah, you think they'd do that????).
Anyway, I have little doubt that the lack of reception noticed upon the switch of the routers from Siemens to a newer model Linksys may in fact be the culprit, rather than something inexplicably causing the IPAQ to suddenly lose reception....Not that the IPAQ radio is the best, but it's not bad....
|
| |
|
|
|