[ignar]

OK. I looked up the specs, and here we go.

- 4150: 4.47 x 2.78 x .53 in. Weight: 4.67 oz.
- X3: 4.5 x 3 x .6 (not including antenna nub). Weight: 4.9 oz.
- x30: 4.6 x 3 x .6 (not including antenna nub). Weight: 4.7 oz. (non-wireless model), 4.9 ounces for wireless models.

So 4150 is .23 oz lighter than X3 or X30 which shares the same weight. I think X3 felt lighter to me due to its larger size than 4150. In any case, the weight of X3 didn't bother me at all. The shape and size did and that's why I returned it in favor of 4150. But with X30, I will probably take it over 4150 if I buy one right now since it is so much better value for the money.

[ignar]

OK. I looked up the specs, and here we go.

- 4150: 4.47 x 2.78 x .53 in. Weight: 4.67 oz.
- X3: 4.5 x 3 x .6 (not including antenna nub). Weight: 4.9 oz.
- x30: 4.6 x 3 x .6 (not including antenna nub). Weight: 4.7 oz. (non-wireless model), 4.9 ounces for wireless models.

So 4150 is .23 oz lighter than X3 or X30 which shares the same weight. I think X3 felt lighter to me due to its larger size than 4150. In any case, the weight of X3 didn't bother me at all. The shape and size did and that's why I returned it in favor of 4150. But with X30, I will probably take it over 4150 if I buy one right now since it is so much better value for the money.

[imagine]

Why would you go for an X30 when you already have an hp 4150?? The only difference is the processor, and i dont think it will make that much of a difference other than in synthetic benchmarks. For real world useage, 400 MHz should be very fast considering that the OS and the programs are optimized for that processor speed. Once 624 becomes standard, 400 MHz will still not be slow with new programs.