
09-04-2008, 12:14 AM
|
|
Executive Editor
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,135
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hal Goldstein
To be clear, I approached the subject 3 or 4 times over the past three years with Microsoft. I was basically told that Microsoft lawyers were extremely reticent to let anyone use "Windows" and "Windows Mobile" and that I would probably have to pay a very stiff licensing fee if I wanted to use it. I did not think the effort was worthwhile, but if I persisted, Microsoft may or may not have relented.
|
That's more or less what I've been told about using Windows Mobile Thoughts as a site name. It seems like the marketing people are a bit afraid of me actually asking the lawyers, but I've pondered going all the way up to Ballmer to ask for permission to use the name, under a free license. He always says he want to hear from his MVPs, so...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hal Goldstein
However, I don't think "Windows Mobile" has the appeal or even the name recognition as "Pocket PC" or "Smartphone". "Windows Mobile" is in a sense an abstraction. "Pocket PC" and "Smartphone" are names of devices and concrete and more appealing on newsstand.
|
Indeed - Windows Mobile as a brand is unknown in the market as a whole, but people have heard the term "smartphone" before. This is the exact problem I'm having with what will happen to Pocket PC Thoughts and Smartphone Thoughts. Do I use Windows Mobile Thoughts, even if I were to get permission? Or do I use Smartphone Thoughts as the singular site for the merged PPCT + SPT site?
|
| |
|
|
|