Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Dunn
Windows Mobile isn't part of the discussion, even though there are phones running Windows Mobile that compare quite well with those other phones. I thought I'd share my reaction to that article here, in no particular order
|
Good points, Jason, but I have to ask: what about all the other Pre reviews that don't mention Windows Mobile either? There's Engadget, Gizmodo, etc.
I think there are two additional points which you didn't consider:
1. WM Pro, pre-6.5, is not a primarily touch-oriented operating system. Others have bolted solutions on it, but the three touch user interfaces being compared are iPhone, Android, and webOS.
2. Where's Microsoft's marketing of Windows Mobile? I see Apple and RIM commercials on the TV and other media all the time -- they're inescapable. I haven't seen a WM commercial in a long time. I did see some as a few billboards in train stations and airports, and maybe a TV ad or two, but they're long gone. On the other hand, I
do see Zune commercials and attempts by Microsoft (events, etc.) to build up interest.
Microsoft needs to move fast on this if they don't want to lose mindshare entirely. If WM leaves the topic of discussion, that's danger right there. I know WM sold 20+ million licenses, but I simply don't see people carrying or talking about their Windows Mobile phones anymore, be it at work, on the subway, etc. Part of it is what you said -- the ecosystem. It's a lot easier to say the "Android phone" or the "iPhone" when people are showing it to each other, as opposed to the nth naming of HTC's Touch Pro. Of my own social circle, I have one friend who seems to be happy with the Touch Pro, another one who's extraordinarily unhappy with the old Touch, and that's it. Pretty soon I'll be down to one friend who I know has a WM device.
Sadly, I think Microsoft is its own worst enemy with WM.
--janak