Windows Phone Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!


Digital Home Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...

Android Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > WINDOWS PHONE THOUGHTS > Windows Phone Talk

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2003, 04:40 AM
QYV
Intellectual
QYV's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 226

Jason, thanks very much for the extensive testing/reporting! I have been waiting for this article since the launch of WM 2003 to see whether or not I could expect some nice speed gains with an Axim upgrade to 2003. While it's not apples to apples of course, your numbers give me a lot of hope - if Dell ever manages to ship the darn thing. :evil:

One thing to note about the much-maligned Xscale - in the "fixed" 255 form, it does seem to offer substantially more battery life than a 206MHz StrongARM. To me, performance that's almost identical with a big boost in battery life is a decent reason to upgrade. At the same time, of course, I suspect Intel could have done better, although we'll need comparisons of the new non-Intel ARM chips to support that claim.
 
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2003, 05:53 AM
Neophyte
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1

I've read all about the good things about Windows Mobile 2003, but I have a concern. I was trying out games such as Turjah II, Motocross Stunt Racer, and Bust'em and have noticed slowdowns and slightly choppy sound on my iPAQ 1940. I went to CompUSA and tried playing those same games off my SD card and found that the Pocket PC 2002 devices played them all fine, but the ones with Windows Mobile 2003 had the same problem. Has anyone tried these games also on their WM2K3 device? My guess is that this may have some relation to the slowdown that Dell fixed.
 
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2003, 06:52 AM
Intellectual
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 245

Quote:
Originally Posted by whydidnt
I guess the one thing that seems to hit me in the face is how much of a fraud the 400 Mhz X-Scale CPU is. It seems we would all be cruising along in the left lane if Intel had just decided to continue developing/improving the original StrongArm CPU's rather than forcing a new technology down our throats.
I thought that the new processor gives improved battery life. What would be a good test is to test the battery life of the 545x upgraded to PPC 2k3 compared to that of the 555x. I thought Jason that you were doing some sort of article about that a few months back? What ever happened to that :?:
 
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2003, 06:52 AM
Intellectual
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 248

Quote:
Originally Posted by whydidnt
I guess the one thing that seems to hit me in the face is how much of a fraud the 400 Mhz X-Scale CPU is. It seems we would all be cruising along in the left lane if Intel had just decided to continue developing/improving the original StrongArm CPU's rather than forcing a new technology down our throats.
You should keep in mind that the XScale is not only about performance, it is also about power consumption.
 
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2003, 08:37 AM
Neophyte
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 5
Send a message via MSN to ErectionJackson

Great work Jason, shows me that it is indeed a good move to upgrade my ancient (I bought it one year ago damnit! :twisted: ) 3870 But what I'm interested in is the stability of the 2003 OS compared to 2002. Do you notice less crashes and lock ups? Not that my 3870 crashes often, but since it's a big complaint from a lot of PPC users I was wondering if this has been improved as well
 
Reply With Quote
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2003, 09:19 AM
Pupil
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 30
Default Still ticking

Well, I guess I don't feel so bad about sticking with my old iPaq 3600 series iPaq with the first Pocket PC OS (2000) I would have lost a lot a speed it looks like with the upgrade. Maybe this will convince me to get a new PDA. Hmm. So many choices!
 
Reply With Quote
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2003, 09:42 AM
Theorist
petvas's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 300
Send a message via AIM to petvas Send a message via MSN to petvas Send a message via Skype™ to petvas

Quote:
Originally Posted by mhowie
Quote:
Originally Posted by petvas
That would be great!!! Could you possible add the 3970 also (with WM2003)? I hope it would be relatively easy to find one.... 8)
This is what I am looking for as well... a comparison of the 3970 w/ WM2003 and the 2215!!!

Thanks,
Then you should read This
 
Reply With Quote
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2003, 09:44 AM
Theorist
petvas's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 300
Send a message via AIM to petvas Send a message via MSN to petvas Send a message via Skype™ to petvas

Quote:
Originally Posted by ErectionJackson
Great work Jason, shows me that it is indeed a good move to upgrade my ancient (I bought it one year ago damnit! :twisted: ) 3870 But what I'm interested in is the stability of the 2003 OS compared to 2002. Do you notice less crashes and lock ups? Not that my 3870 crashes often, but since it's a big complaint from a lot of PPC users I was wondering if this has been improved as well
Windows Mobile 2003 is much more stable and reliable than Pocket PC 2002. I barely have to restart anymore using my H5555. I reboot only after switching batteries... 8)
 
Reply With Quote
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2003, 09:57 AM
Thinker
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 443

Quote:
Originally Posted by JTWise
I too am very disappointed that PIE speeds have not improved. What good does it do to add a bunch of features to something that is so PAINFULLY slow :twak:
If you are trying to 'sync' pages from desktop for later viewing, you should check out iSilo. Much faster than IE.
 
Reply With Quote
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 08-21-2003, 01:05 PM
Pupil
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 41

Quote:
Originally Posted by QYV
Jason, thanks very much for the extensive testing/reporting! I have been waiting for this article since the launch of WM 2003 to see whether or not I could expect some nice speed gains with an Axim upgrade to 2003. While it's not apples to apples of course, your numbers give me a lot of hope - if Dell ever manages to ship the darn thing.
Sorry to chime in, I normally only read here, but I wanted to offer up these results I have had with the Axims.

http://www.aximsite.com/reviews/results.html

Enjoy.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


LinkBacks (?)
LinkBack to this Thread: http://forums.thoughtsmedia.com/f396/windows-mobile-2003-really-faster-48531.html
Posted By For Type Date
Windows Phone Thoughts: Is Windows Mobile 2003 Really Faster? This thread Refback 02-22-2010 02:21 AM
Pocket PC Thoughts: Is Windows Mobile 2003 Really Faster? This thread Refback 05-31-2008 10:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:49 PM.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0