
10-16-2009, 05:22 AM
|
|
Neophyte
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2
|
|
stale like what?
The question is: Do these reviewers or anything but Microsoft fanatics do anything other than thumb-icons-shuffling and email? The rage today is the back and forth shuffling of visual gunk and the novelty of the new cell phone oses. Talking of phone oses, the only one that looks and feels like an os is Windows Mobile. The others look and feel more like simple cell phone interfaces. Windows Mobile users will know what I mean; those who never used or will use it will never care for the facts. Windows Mobile is not perfect but it feels old and it is not pretty and this alone drives those who chase novelty crazy. It puts the emphasis on productivity first and entertainment second. Now, ask any of those reviewers what Windows Mobile does not do and does not do well and their biggest gripe is that it uses a stylus. No matter how big the icons are made for our thumbs, we will still need a stylus to edit an email Excel or Word attachment. Try doing that with your thumb. So, I don’t think that resistive screen technology is going away. Cell phone makers see a bigger future for resistive technology a technology that will only get better and even more precise. That is why they are still putting out phones with this technology. There is more to productivity than easily shuffling icons. The other big point that Windows Mobile haters (it is just cool to hate anything Microsoft) don’t realize is that it is the only interface that allows you to do most of what modern cell phones technology offers.
Microsoft deserves the situation that it finds itself in. It is a company that follows trends it does not create them or innovates. It had to turn on a dime with the introduction of the GUI, the multimedia PC, the internet revolution, the mobile phone popularity surge, etc. You would think that a large company with so many resources would have learned by now that you cannot fall asleep on your laurels.
|
| |
|
|
|