
06-02-2004, 10:49 PM
|
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 533
|
|
Well, the same thing has just happened to my Wife's MPX200. I remebered I read David's posting on the subject, and immediately found this thread again to review people's replies / thought on the subject.
While I appreciate Graffiti and NYC567user's thoughts on the cause, and I'm sure oxidation is the #1 cause (as they state) for this problem for GSM in general, when reducing focus to just MPX200 units, the cause for this error on those models *may* be different.
Why? First and foremost, why did a hard reset of David's Smartphone solves the problem? Indeed, the Microsoft Smartphone 2002 OS, while ambitious and desirable, may have ghosts in the machine......it is, after all Microsoft's first shot at a phone OS, and they've already released a newer version (Smartphone 2003).
Second, all MPX200's are fairly new (including my wife's and David's I'm assuming)....why would SIM cards in only MPX200's oxidize faster than other phones (I've used both a T68m and now a T616 with the same SIM for a couple years now and have never seen this problem)?
Indeed, I believe it to be either an OS bug, or more likely, a hardware design flaw. Specifically, at least on my wife's MPX200, there is no top SIM card holder, only a sliding bottom holder that (barely) lock the SIM card in place. Apparently the designers thought the battery would hold in the SIM card in place of a top SIM holder. My first question is, do all MPX200's lack this top SIM holder (I can produce a picture if needed)? If so, what is most likely happening is after a couple months of use, the SIM card, being fairly loose, gets scratched by the contacts and becomes less and less reliable over time. A new SIM card fixes the situation, but again, only for a couple months until the new SIM card becomes scratched. This theory, however, can't explain why a hard reset fixed David's.
Bottom line, a lot of questions remain.
|
| |
|
|
|