[garrans]

Ed, been a little inundated with the ubiquitous "what did you see at the MVP conference?" questions huh ?

[garrans]

Ed, been a little inundated with the ubiquitous "what did you see at the MVP conference?" questions huh ?

[Kevin Jackson]

NDA = No {bleep} Answers

[Gator5000e]

In all {bleepin"} seriousness, Jason had requested a list of items that we would like to see improved on or changed. I don't think it would be a violation of any bleepin NDA to let us know if that list was presented to MS and what their response was to that list. Especially if the responses were something like "that is a known problem we are looking into" or "that will be fixed" or something like that.

You guys willing to give us that much?

Thanks.

[Rob Borek]

Originally Posted by Gator5000e

In all {bleepin"} seriousness, Jason had requested a list of items that we would like to see improved on or changed. I don't think it would be a violation of any bleepin NDA to let us know if that list was presented to MS and what their response was to that list. Especially if the responses were something like "that is a known problem we are looking into" or "that will be fixed" or something like that.

Jason no doubt gave them the list. The responses, however, would be covered under NDA.

(speaking from experience)

[Ed Hansberry]

Originally Posted by Gator5000e

In all {bleepin"} seriousness, Jason had requested a list of items that we would like to see improved on or changed. I don't think it would be a violation of any bleepin NDA to let us know if that list was presented to MS and what their response was to that list. Especially if the responses were something like "that is a known problem we are looking into" or "that will be fixed" or something like that.

You guys willing to give us that much?

We spoke. They listened intently and asked probing questions. It would be a violation of the NDA to discuss the results of that converstation though. Sorry.

[Bill Gunn]

Of all of the things that Microsoft publicly announces, what percentage actually make it into a product? Now imagine what that percentage is for things that it will not publicly discuss. Now imagine why I'm not curious. :wink:

[baker]

Ed is {bleeping} so he does not have to tell us that ActiveSync is staying the same... :lol:

[Jason Dunn]

Originally Posted by Gator5000e

In all {bleepin"} seriousness, Jason had requested a list of items that we would like to see improved on or changed. I don't think it would be a violation of any bleepin NDA to let us know if that list was presented to MS and what their response was to that list.

I can tell you that I did my best to present as many of the issues as possible, and some are definitely on the roadmap to be addressed, but I'll be honest: there wasn't enough time in each session to really drill down and drive the points home (ten minutes at the end of a session with 40+ people made that difficult). There was also an ungodly amount of posts in that thread, which I should have expected, but it was a real challenge to even filter through them and pull out the content.

Still, I really appreciated everyone's input and you can rest assured a few of the more important ones (alarms!) were raised.

[T-Will]

Wow! Sounds like a great list of new features! :lol: I didn't read anything negative, so I'm guessing we're gonna see some nice new things with Pocket PC.

[jpaq]

So, what your saying is:

- Pocket {Bleep} still doesn't support {Bleep}s or {Bleep}s
- {Bleep} still doesn't {Bleep} {Bleep}s
- {Bleep} will continue to support one {Bleep}
- But we get a brand new {Bleep}!