I remember it very clearly. It was January 2007, and I was sitting in my office furiously refreshing the page on my work computer reading the liveblogging that was going on. It was finally here; Steve Jobs was announcing the iPhone. It was a device thousands upon thousands of loyal Apple customers were dying for. A phone designed to work with their platform, not hacked to "function" with it. Out of the box, it was designed to sync our contacts and calendar, give us e-mail that was better than anything else on the market, and a web experience that no one on the market could match. I'll never forget how my mind boggled that day, and I haven't felt that way about a product announcement since then. Today, however, I think another company has finally done something that I never thought I would see: developed a competitor to the iPhone that could take a bite out of the iPhone, and surprise of surprises, it's Palm.Let's face it. For the past few years, Palm has been nothing short of a joke. Treo after Treo waddled to market exciting pretty much no one. For the most part they were incremental upgrades to existing models. Their first new model came two years ago in the form of the Palm Centro, a model decidedly targeted at the low-end "wants a PDA that's cheap" customer. Palm has languished in mediocrity with their line of PDA's, bungled an announcement of the Foleo only to later revoke it, and left its much hyped Palm OS 6.0 buried in corporate headquarters never to be seen in public view.
Palm also has been losing money hand over fist, making it a buyout target and the subject of constant rumors about its future. Management has been called incompetent and ineffective and has been changed too many times to count over the past three to four years. In a word, the company appeared to be falling apart and an icon of what ushered in the era of PDAs looked to be dead in the water.
It was with that in mind that many tech journalists said, before Palm's announcement at CES last week, that the announcement was going to make or break the company. Luckily for them, it may just have been the shot in the arm they needed.
If you've read anything I've written over the past few months, you'll know how I feel about "iPhone killers." I'm tired of the moniker being slapped on every new phone that shows some kind of gimmicky new feature set and usually these "killers" end up being roadkill under the wheels of the iPhone. The Verizon Voyager? Sold great at the beginning, but by Christmas, a mere two months after its release, no one cared anymore. The BlackBerry Storm? How many have you seen in public? The HTC Touch Diamond Special Super X1 Mobile Monster Mega Edition HD VGA? Never seen one on the NYC subway, arguably a melting pot of mobile devices.
Yet, with all those flops and over statements, I truly think Palm has a winner on its hands with the Pre.
Oh sure, it doesn't run "real" applications. And yes, it's completely incompatible with every prior iteration of the Palm OS. Even with those two major dings, the amount of thought put into the device is evident from the very first time you see the video demonstration. The UI is meant to be touched, glided, and slid across. Transitions from app to app are smooth. Multitasking, something Apple essentially decided to forego in the iPhone, is painless and natural. The deck of cards metaphor works as you shuffle through running applications. Gestures are employed naturally and in a separate part of the phone (a Godsend if you're tired of wiping the screen of your phone on your pants). Start typing and the phone figures out what you're trying to do (a la Quicksilver). I could go on and on, but you're starting to get the picture.
While many manufacturers have taken their existing phones and slapped a touch screen on them and bragged about having a touch screen device, Palm has rethought the touch screen in much the same way Apple did, and I think the Pre might very well be the first smart phone released post iPhone whose creators can say they've learned the lessons of the iPhone. UI is primary above all else. Not the screen. Not the network the phone is on. Not the stupid tangential features thrown in. If the phone isn't usable, people will notice.
Palm has learned the lesson of the iPhone, and it'll be interesting to see how well it demonstrates what it learned when it's released in April.
Vincent Ferrari is an Apple fan, videoblogger, blogger, writer, and all-around geek from the Bronx. He works in the IT Department of a cellular phone company that shall not be named, and lives in a very comfortable apartment with his lovely wife, two lovely cats, three Macs, two iPhones, and God-knows-how-many iPods of varying age.
Do you enjoy using new hardware, software and accessories, then sharing your experience with others? Then join us on the Thoughts Media Review Team! We're looking for individuals who find it fun to test new gear and give their honest opinions about the experience. It's a volunteer role with some great perks. Interested? Then click here for more information.
__________________
Current Apple Stuff: 24" iMac, iPhone 4, AppleTV (original), 4gb Shuffle, 64gb iPad 2.
I'm pretty much with you on this one. Looking at the Pre, it is clearly something distinctive and unique and really does bring something different to the table unlike other so-called iPhone killers.
I'm really cheering for Palm on this one. It's been years since I've used a Palm device, having moved to Windows Mobile many years ago (and still using WM in conjunction with my Blackberry). This is the the first phone since the iPhone that I've really felt excited about. Go Palm Go!
I just hope it isn't too late for Palm. My gut says this is the device that will save Palm and make them a major player again.
Now, how easy will it be to use with Macs?
__________________
XBox 360 S, 16GB iPhone 4S, iPod Classic 160 GB, Dell Inspiron Mini 1018; Macs: Mac Mini 2.4 GHz 6 GB RAM; Macbook 2.0 GHz 3 GB RAM; MacBook Air 11", 24" Cinema Display
I think calling anything an iPhone killer is stupid too. It smacks of a "one size fits all" mentality, as if somebody will come out with one device that everybody will want to use. The iPhone is one sweet device, and I love my iPod Touch, but I've deliberately chosen the Windows Mobile platform for my phone because I prefer a few capabilities it has and the iPhone still lacks.
As you said, the iPhone is a phone "for us". It works on the platform of those who prefer Apple. I figure the only thing that can kill the iPhone is Apple, either by releasing a totally new device or one day not updating the iPhone to keep up with the world.
__________________
Current devices: iPhone 3G. Previous devices: Samsung Epix and 1st gen 32GB iPod Touch BlackJack II, iPaq 6945, iPaq hx4705, Dell Axim x30 high, iPaq 3765.
I'm not so convinced it'll matter. From what I gather, it's all about the cloud with the Pre, meaning as long as your cloud-related apps sync with your computer, it'll run on any platform. I think the days of desktop syncing may very well be over in the eyes of Palm, and if that's the case it's a very forward-thinking and welcome change in philosophy.
__________________
Current Apple Stuff: 24" iMac, iPhone 4, AppleTV (original), 4gb Shuffle, 64gb iPad 2.
I'm not so convinced it'll matter. From what I gather, it's all about the cloud with the Pre, meaning as long as your cloud-related apps sync with your computer, it'll run on any platform. I think the days of desktop syncing may very well be over in the eyes of Palm, and if that's the case it's a very forward-thinking and welcome change in philosophy.
I'm already there. I just reset my Windows Mobile phone from scratch and everything is syncing through the cloud. I am using Spanning Sync to get calendars and contacts to Google Calendar and Gmail, and NuevaSync to bring it down using Exchange services, and I am using Verizon's wireless e-mail sync with Gmail. Everything is push, everything works great.
If there is ever a reason to get or send a file to the phone, I use Bluetooth with the MacBook.
I'm not so convinced it'll matter. From what I gather, it's all about the cloud with the Pre, meaning as long as your cloud-related apps sync with your computer, it'll run on any platform. I think the days of desktop syncing may very well be over in the eyes of Palm, and if that's the case it's a very forward-thinking and welcome change in philosophy.
While I'm not a huge fan of cloud computing, synchronisation is the one area where I find the cloud to be of immense value. I use MobileMe to keep my Macs in sync and is the primary reason I have the service at all. If Palm is really moving to cloud based synchronisation, I agree it's a welcome change in philosophy. Not having to deal with desktop based syncs and all the vagaries thereof would be a godsend!
__________________
XBox 360 S, 16GB iPhone 4S, iPod Classic 160 GB, Dell Inspiron Mini 1018; Macs: Mac Mini 2.4 GHz 6 GB RAM; Macbook 2.0 GHz 3 GB RAM; MacBook Air 11", 24" Cinema Display
While I'm not a huge fan of cloud computing, synchronisation is the one area where I find the cloud to be of immense value. I use MobileMe to keep my Macs in sync and is the primary reason I have the service at all. If Palm is really moving to cloud based synchronisation, I agree it's a welcome change in philosophy. Not having to deal with desktop based syncs and all the vagaries thereof would be a godsend!
My sentiments exactly.
__________________
Current Apple Stuff: 24" iMac, iPhone 4, AppleTV (original), 4gb Shuffle, 64gb iPad 2.
Nicely-written post, Vincent. I thought the exact same thing when I saw the Pre. Of course, the devil's in the details, but it seems like Palm realizes this. The switch to card ("task")-based execution is a natural progression from what mobile devices now. The Pre is the first device I've seen that's made me pause and say, "hey, I might want this over the iPhone" (and, no, I'm not labeling it an iPhone-killer, just really cool).
Oh, and it makes MS's slow movement in WM even more glaring. I mean, Microsoft, really? You're letting an also-ran who took about 5 years too long to replace Garnet come up with this before any substantial rerelease of your OS? You're going to let Apple, Google, and even Palm get in a release before you?
I really hope Apple is paying attention and will take a page from Palm's book as regards multi-tasking. I love my iPhone but I'm getting really tired of pressing the Home button to bounce back and forth between applications. My biggest aggravation is having to close an app just to change some minor setting (like brightness or mail fetching frequency) and then close the settings and then open up the app I was just in and then waiting for it to initialize. Argghhh! That said, I am nowhere near ready to return to Windows Mobile. Just picking up my old Toshiba e830 (which used to be my favoritest mobile device ever) makes me cringe. But sooner or later if Apple doesn't continue to innovate the iPhone platform I will get sick enough of single-tasking that I might jump ship to something else like the Pre. Just sayin'.
But I agree- this is the first device I've been excited about since the iPhone was announced. I hope it does well.
__________________ 64 GB iPad 2 WiFi, Apple TV 2, 32 GB iPhone 4
Early 2011 MacBook Pro 13" (dual boot with Windows 7), Early 2009 Mac Mini