Pocket PC Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!





Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > POCKET PC THOUGHTS > Pocket PC Articles

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 12-31-2007, 11:00 PM
Contributing Editor
Ed Hansberry's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,846
Default Is Your GSM Phone Keeping You Awake?

http://piers.mit.edu/piersonline/piers.php?volume=3&number=7&page=1148

"During actual exposure [to GSM signals], as compared to sham exposure, sleep initiated one hour after exposure was affected. There was a prolonged latency to reach the first cycle of deep sleep (stage 3). The amount of stage 4 sleep was also decreased in exposed subjects. NG subjects reported more headaches during exposures vs. sham exposure. Neither group (SG and NG) was able to detect the true exposure status more frequently than by chance alone."

No wonder I am always so tired. I knew it had nothing to do with staying up so late. 8O
__________________
Boring text sig
 
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-01-2008, 04:42 PM
Ponderer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 58
Send a message via AIM to fone_fanatic Send a message via Yahoo to fone_fanatic

A couple years ago i used to sleep with my phone under my pillow so the alarm would wake me up.. after a couple days of that i'd wake up with a ridiculous headache and my left eye felt like it was gonna pop out.. so i stopped doing that, but most of the time its on my bed while i sleep.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2008, 12:27 AM
Oracle
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 916

From what I recall of the discnssion on Slashdot, the source PDF was very short on scientific method, and the transmitter power used was a couple of orders of magnitude more than normal cellphone intensity. Meaningful? Or propaganda via bad science?
 
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2008, 12:48 AM
Contributing Editor
Ed Hansberry's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 7,846

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gerard
From what I recall of the discnssion on Slashdot, the source PDF was very short on scientific method,
uhm... the only thing I get out of slashdot discussions is there are a bunch of people with waaaay too much time on their hands and they also find fault with any and everything, unless it is about linux and opensource, which are perfect. /. is half a rung above fark for intelligent discussion. both are hysterical though, fark just doesn't take itself seriously.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:35 AM.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7