Pocket PC Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!





Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > POCKET PC THOUGHTS > Pocket PC Articles

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2003, 03:30 PM
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,595
Default The Next Generation: HP Ipaq H2210/H2215

http://www.tomshardware.com/newslet...l3/36/ipaq.html

"The well-known and much praised design of the Ipaq 3-series has had its day. The world's most successful Pocket PC family, according to Dataquest Gartner, now has a new family member - the 22xx series. HP has just launched the first model in this new product line - the Ipaq H2210/2215. The fact that the models H2210 and H2215 are basically the same product is bound to lead to some customer confusion. The H2215 is being distributed through retail channels, while the H2210 is targeted at business customers."

It's always interesting to read Pocket PC reviews by non-PDA sites, because there will almost always be subtle errors. I'm sure camera review site owners groan in the same way when I talk about cameras here. ;-) The authors of this article state that Windows Mobile 2003 has been "finally been optimized for XScale processors", which is false. Windows Mobile 2003 has been optimized for the ARM5 instruction yet, which will benefit the XScale CPU, but also the Samsung and any other ARM5 processor. It's a subtle, but important difference. If Microsoft chose to optimize for one CPU from one vendor, they'd be placing a big bet on that one chip. Optimizing for the instruction set instead of a single CPU is a smarter move.

Still, this is a good article if only for the benchmarking data - they've cooked up their own benchmarking tool, so the data is different than what most of you have seen.
__________________
Thanks for visiting our forums!
 
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2003, 03:35 PM
5000+ Posts? I Should OWN This Site!
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,211

I'm very surprised about the battery results. My experience has the Axim lasting much longer than those results indicate...
 
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2003, 04:14 PM
Magi
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,047
Send a message via ICQ to maximus

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kati Compton
I'm very surprised about the battery results. My experience has the Axim lasting much longer than those results indicate...
Yup. With the standard battery, I experienced at least 7-8 hours with Running Voice GSM running.
 
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2003, 04:21 PM
Ponderer
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 114
Send a message via AIM to The Half-Ling Send a message via MSN to The Half-Ling Send a message via Yahoo to The Half-Ling

i saw a rather odd error in MobilePlanet catolog week. they were advertising the 5100 series iPAQ and as a picture they put a 5500 without the antenna. it was like a 5100 w/ fingerprint reader lol...

Cheers,
Jake-
 
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 09-10-2003, 05:00 PM
Pontificator
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,352
Default Re: The Next Generation: HP Ipaq H2210/H2215

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason Dunn
"I'm sure camera review site owners groan in the same way when I talk about cameras here. ;-)
Remember Jason. The big barrely thing points out at your subject


ops: Sorry I couldn't help myself.
__________________
PDA History: Palm Pilot 5000 -> Apple Newton 2100 -> Casio E-11 -> iPaq 3650 (64MB Upgrade) -> iPaq 3700 -> Casio EM-500 -> HP Jornada 568 -> HP iPaq hx4705 www.spreadfirefox.com
 
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2003, 02:56 PM
Philosopher
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 576

ARM 5 Instruction set?

Mabuhay! ~ Carlo
 
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2003, 03:09 PM
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,595

Quote:
Originally Posted by ppcsurfr
ARM 5 Instruction set?
Was there a question in there?
__________________
Thanks for visiting our forums!
 
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 09-11-2003, 04:17 PM
Philosopher
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 576

Well, I thought the SA1110 didn't support the ARM5 Instruction set...

It's just a wonder then that even processors which are designed for the ARM v4 instruction set run pretty well too...

Mabuhay! ~ Carlo
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:20 AM.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7