ppcnewbie,
I happen to believe (as do many) that the tobacco industry is an immoral one (in line with the Heroin and Cocaine 'industries') which is regarded differently purely due to historical accident that bequeathed a legal status on a dangerous drug. Thus I registered my unease with praising the use of Pocket PCs to make things easier for tobacco growers (yeah, I know - they pay taxes, job losses if they didn't do it and all the other common arguments for keeping this one drug legal when we outlaw less harmful ones etc. etc.) in a fairly gentle way. Not sure how you managed to interpret my post as an attack on people's freedom!
Since you made the points though (and at the risk of Steve or Kati's scissors) - one time only:
Quote:
|
There isnt anything wrong with tobacco.
|
...except that it kills people (disproportionately the poor), leaches money from the least wealthy sectors of society, deforms babies in the womb, costs billions in health care, is one of the most highly addictive substances on earth and has absolutely zero positive value (hell - even cannabis has health benefits!).
Hmmm... in moderation alchohol is harmless and can have many social and even health benefits while tobacco starts causing harm with the first cigarette - so... no!
Quote:
|
I think that a person should be accountable for their own decisions. No one ever said smoking was healthy.
|
Then again second-hand smoke is a major problem and every year countless children, who have never smoked themselves, enter hospitals with smoking related illnesses gained from parents and family. I have no issue with people being accountable for their smoking - same as they are accountable for taking any other drug. Doesn't mean I have to think nice thoughts of the growers, peddlers and dealers...!