Pocket PC Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!





Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > POCKET PC THOUGHTS > Pocket PC Hardware

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2003, 08:45 PM
Contributing Editor
Janak Parekh's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 14,940
Default Pretec SDIO Products

http://www.computex.com.tw/news_arc....asp?index=5387

Pretec recently announced their SD Camera. Looks pretty cool -- let's hope it doesn't share the same problems as their 1.3MP CompactFlash Camera.



"SD Camera uses [a] VGA CMOS senor, can take still image picture or capture video clips up to 640X480 resolution, which is 400% better than most PDA and color big screen cellular phone today." 400%!? Hmm...

In the same news release, they also refer to the SD Presenter, which will apparently support 1024x768 output from the Pocket PC, as well as products to come out later this year, including GPS, Bluetooth, WLAN, and GPRS cards. Perhaps 2004 will finally be the year of the SDIO card; out of curiosity, how many of you are using SDIO peripherals now?
 
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2003, 09:32 PM
Philosopher
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 496
Send a message via AIM to Kaber
Default How many SDIO Devices do I use?

None. The latest ROM upgrade for the iPAQ 3955 included an SDIO upgrade, but I use the SD slot on my iPAQ for storage. In fact the majority of my installed apps are on the SD card. I guess this is better news for those with a PDA that has native dual card slots (a lot of the newer PDAs have CF and SD slots ).

I have many CF/PC Card devices though which I use in my dual sleeve.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2003, 09:40 PM
Theorist
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 294
Default Re: Pretec SDIO Products

Quote:
Originally Posted by Janak Parekh
"SD Camera uses [a] VGA CMOS senor, can take still image picture or capture video clips up to 640X480 resolution, which is 400% better than most PDA and color big screen cellular phone today." 400%!? Hmm...
Wonder what their frame of reference is? A Palm Pilot perhaps :roll:
 
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2003, 10:19 PM
Neophyte
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 7

Seems right to me...

Last time I checked, 320x240 (PPC resolution) had 1/4 as many pixels as 640x480. This would make the camera 400% better as far as the amount of data in a picture is concerned. 8)
 
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2003, 10:30 PM
Theorist
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 294

Quote:
Originally Posted by foghead
Seems right to me...

Last time I checked, 320x240 (PPC resolution) had 1/4 as many pixels as 640x480. This would make the camera 400% better as far as the amount of data in a picture is concerned. 8)
Hmmm...looks like you are right...however the Sony Clie has a 480x320 screen which would not equate to 400% better.
 
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-22-2003, 10:42 PM
Neophyte
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 7

Yeah, but the Sony Clies don't have an SD slot either. The Palm TT has 320x320 resolution and SDIO, so the camera is only about 300% better, but since the press release only mentions PPCs and this is a PPC site, I thought that was quibbling.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2003, 01:19 AM
Ponderer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 90

Also, I've seen photos on the Clie, and they 'suck'.

Too bad my Axim doesn't do SDIO.
 
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2003, 02:35 AM
Contributing Editor
Janak Parekh's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 14,940

Quote:
Originally Posted by foghead
Last time I checked, 320x240 (PPC resolution) had 1/4 as many pixels as 640x480. This would make the camera 400% better as far as the amount of data in a picture is concerned. 8)
Of course. That wasn't my point. My point was that (a) it's marketing-speak to make it sound huge; and (b) you can now fairly readily get 640x480 and better cameras (witness the Nokia 3650 on the low-end, and the Clie NZ90 on the high-end).

--janak
 
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2003, 02:48 AM
Neophyte
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 7

I understod your point.

I just didn't think that it was really innapropriate because while display size is normally expressed as "HxV", ie 640x480, the digital camera industry normally refers to the number of pixels or megapixels and manufacturers make a huge deal over relatively small percentage increases.

That was one of the better run-on sentences that I have written in awhile. ops:
 
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-23-2003, 03:06 AM
Contributing Editor
Janak Parekh's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 14,940

Quote:
Originally Posted by foghead
I just didn't think that it was really innapropriate because while display size is normally expressed as "HxV", ie 640x480, the digital camera industry normally refers to the number of pixels or megapixels and manufacturers make a huge deal over relatively small percentage increases.
Of course. It was my (little) attempt to rail at it. Especially for a sub-1 megapixel unit.

Quote:
That was one of the better run-on sentences that I have written in awhile. ops:
Hmm, I'll have to send the grammar police at you. I think Pony99CA qualifies as that around here. Steve, where are you when we need you? :lol:

--janak
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:58 PM.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7