
11-30-2006, 10:15 PM
|
|
Contributing Editor
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,727
|
|
peaz, thanks for the link, great article!
__________________
"A planner is a gentle man, with neither sword nor pistol.
He walks along most daintily, because his balls are crystal."
|
| |
|
|
|

11-30-2006, 10:59 PM
|
|
Pupil
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 16
|
|
I am not a tech person by any stretch of imagination but want to put this question on the board anyways cause I felt like it and please help me out on this you tech geeks.
Is there any remote possibilty that you can replace your original proccessor with this one when it does come out?
|
| |
|
|
|

11-30-2006, 11:13 PM
|
|
Pontificator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,124
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by blissfull
Is there any remote possibilty that you can replace your original proccessor with this one when it does come out?
|
No. These embedded processors require special machines to install or remove from a board, and even if you had that, it's incredibly unlikely that the size and pinout would be compatible with older processors.
|
| |
|
|
|

12-01-2006, 02:53 AM
|
|
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 625
|
|
Thanks Ken for the link 
|
| |
|
|
|

12-02-2006, 01:04 AM
|
|
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 625
|
|
um another question if the P3XX [the higher end ones] have in-built hardware for graphics [the one for better VGA playback and display] do apps still need to be VGA aware/compatible?
|
| |
|
|
|

12-02-2006, 06:51 AM
|
|
Pontificator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,124
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bnycastro
um another question if the P3XX [the higher end ones] have in-built hardware for graphics [the one for better VGA playback and display] do apps still need to be VGA aware/compatible?
|
Yes. Even if a chip has specialized graphics capabilities (which I think aren't on-board with the fastest chip, if I read correctly) the application still has to support VGA.
|
| |
|
|
|

12-02-2006, 05:12 PM
|
|
Sage
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 625
|
|
I hope more manufacturers snap up these chips and make more VGA devices... the sooner the better of course so that developers/programmers can make their apps VGA aware as well [still have a boatload of apps that look crap on VGA]
|
| |
|
|
|

12-03-2006, 03:56 AM
|
|
Pontificator
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,051
|
|
1.2Ghz? Man, that's faster than my brand new UMPC! WITH improved power efficiency? Man, we live in a great time!
|
| |
|
|
|

12-03-2006, 04:28 PM
|
|
Contributing Editor
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,727
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ricksfiona
1.2Ghz? Man, that's faster than my brand new UMPC!
|
I hate to get into this debate again, but 1.2GHz with a RISC processor is not the same as 1.2GHz in an x86 processor, and is in fact much, much slower.
__________________
"A planner is a gentle man, with neither sword nor pistol.
He walks along most daintily, because his balls are crystal."
|
| |
|
|
|

01-29-2007, 04:54 AM
|
|
Philosopher
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 576
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by bnycastro
I hope more manufacturers snap up these chips and make more VGA devices... the sooner the better of course so that developers/programmers can make their apps VGA aware as well [still have a boatload of apps that look crap on VGA]
|
I don't think that would really impact the development for VGA aware apps... While the Monahans look promising under the new company that handles it, I'm not so sure about the efficiency of their chips as compared to Smasung processors.
__________________
Carlo GuerreroFotógrafo ProfesionalMicrosoft MVP, Mobile Devices
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|