The quality of cleartype text is highly influenced by screen sub-pixel orientation.
If you ignore their color a landscape LCD has 960 (320x3) x 240 'sub-pixels' whileas portrait LCD has 320 x 720 (240×3) 'sub-pixels' which gives the landscape LCD 240 pixels against 720 for the portrait display when used in the portrait orientation.
Now most text... the I is an extreme case are much taller than they are wide and may take 3 pixels horizonally and 8 pixels vertically. Obviously the resolution enhancement would be much more apparent on the 3 horizontal (9 sub pixels) rather than the 8 pixels.
Also on characters such as 'H' the sub horizontal sub-pixels allow the vertical lines to positioned with 3 times the precision, so it the spacing between the two uprights can be controlled much more accuratly. The actual position of the cross bar is FAR less critical to the appearance of the text.
Code:
(Needs fixed pitch font...)
A portrait RGB screen used in portrait mode a 'H' could be:
RGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGB RGBRGBRGBRGBRGBRGB
################## > ##################
###OOO######OOO### > ##OOOOO####OOOOO##
###OOO######OOO### > ###OOO######OOO###
###OOOOOOOOOOOO### > ###OOOOOOOOOOOO###
###OOO######OOO### > ###OOO######OOO###
###OOO######OOO### > ##OOOOO####OOOOO##
################## > ##################
Whereas a landscape screen used in portrait mode a 'H' could be:
R##### > #####
G##### > #####
B##### > #O#O#
R#O#O# > #O#O#
G#O#O# > #O#O#
B#O#O# > #O#O#
R#O#O# > #O#O#
G#O#O# > #O#O#
B#O#O# > #OOO#
R#OOO# > #OOO#
G#OOO# > #OOO#
B#OOO# > #O#O#
R#O#O# > #O#O#
G#O#O# > #O#O#
B#O#O# > #O#O#
R#O#O# > #O#O#
G#O#O# > #O#O#
B#O#O# > #####
R##### > #####
G##### > #####
B##### > #####
Not quite so impressive!!!
Anyway, sorry for boring everyone silly, I was just hoping my new pride and joy would implement Cleartype correctly - I guess I'll only find out on Christmas Day!
My 2c
PJE