Pocket PC Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!





Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > POCKET PC THOUGHTS > HARDWARE DISCUSSION (open to all) > HP iPAQ Pocket PCs

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-04-2004, 05:39 AM
Ponderer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 91
Default BLUETOOTH & ACTIVESYNC.... NEED HELP

I am able to use the bluetooth with my 4355 and my laptop.
However, when I sync with either my laptop or desktop, activesync is acting like it is recognizing the device for the first time.

I've checked settings, and have run out of ideas.

Any suggestions??
__________________
________________________Current Device:* HP IPaq 4350Past devices: Sharp Wizard, Casio E-125, Casio E-200
 
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-04-2004, 10:05 AM
Thinker
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 332

Lots of things could cause this problem. Have you run through the setup wizard and let it create a partnership?

One thing that can cause this is not having the same device name in Bluetooth Setting, as in Start (menu) | Settings | System | About | Device ID |

David
 
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-04-2004, 04:12 PM
Ponderer
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 91

David:

hmmm. I think my laptop shows my ipaq as pocketpc, when it is in my device as dansipaq. I'll try and change this and see what happens.

Thanks,

Dan
__________________
________________________Current Device:* HP IPaq 4350Past devices: Sharp Wizard, Casio E-125, Casio E-200
 
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2004, 09:40 PM
Neophyte
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 5

I didn't realize you could synch through bluetooth. This would be good b/c it makes synching on the road much easier. Is it easy to set up?
 
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2004, 04:29 AM
Pontificator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,332

Quote:
Originally Posted by dbalaban
I didn't realize you could synch through bluetooth. This would be good b/c it makes synching on the road much easier. Is it easy to set up?
So long as your devices can 'discover' one another, it's not too bad to setup. The only thing I have not been able to do via BT is surf/check email, etc. I have a NIC in the desktop, but it's connected to a wireless router and the BT dongle refuses to work with it :evil:
 
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2004, 05:06 AM
5000+ Posts? I Should OWN This Site!
ctmagnus's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,769

Quote:
Originally Posted by byteme
So long as your devices can 'discover' one another, it's not too bad to setup. The only thing I have not been able to do via BT is surf/check email, etc. I have a NIC in the desktop, but it's connected to a wireless router and the BT dongle refuses to work with it :evil:
What OS are you using? BT adapter?

I have a Belkin F8T001 BT adapter that, when connected to a Win2000 machine, let my sync only. I stuck it in a WinXP machine and now I can do the whole nine yards.
__________________
iPhone 3GS! ☠☠☠ Treo Pro!
 
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2004, 02:19 PM
Pontificator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,332

Quote:
Originally Posted by ctmagnus
Quote:
Originally Posted by byteme
So long as your devices can 'discover' one another, it's not too bad to setup. The only thing I have not been able to do via BT is surf/check email, etc. I have a NIC in the desktop, but it's connected to a wireless router and the BT dongle refuses to work with it :evil:
What OS are you using? BT adapter?

I have a Belkin F8T001 BT adapter that, when connected to a Win2000 machine, let my sync only. I stuck it in a WinXP machine and now I can do the whole nine yards.
I'm using XP and a D-Link BT dongle. I thought I read somewhere that this dongle requires a certain IP that is being used by my NIC or router. Would be nice if it worked but not essential. Activesync works well with it.
 
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2004, 09:01 PM
Ponderer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 86

The sync/surf topic was covered in depth in the following thread:

http://www.pocketpcthoughts.com/foru...388&highlight=

I have to admit that I needed some time to sort it all out. My initial problem was not setting the Ipaq to be discoverable by the world (i.e. only allowed paired devices), which obviously did not allow the original pairing connection to be set up. The of course I screwed up the IP on my router. The bulk of the issues had to do with the contention of the IP address of the router, and the shared bluetooth IP connection on the PC (there quite commonly is a conflict, that can be resolved by changing the ROUTER's IP address, the shared bluetooth connection IP is hard coded).

Again look at the above thread, that's how I got mine to surf/sync.

D.psi
__________________
Finally got a new handheld after 2+ yrs!!!J430SE -> J548 -> Ipaq 2210 + 256MB SD card +Stowaway XT
 
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2004, 10:02 PM
Pontificator
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,332

Quote:
Originally Posted by D.psi
The sync/surf topic was covered in depth in the following thread:

http://www.pocketpcthoughts.com/foru...388&highlight=

I have to admit that I needed some time to sort it all out. My initial problem was not setting the Ipaq to be discoverable by the world (i.e. only allowed paired devices), which obviously did not allow the original pairing connection to be set up. The of course I screwed up the IP on my router. The bulk of the issues had to do with the contention of the IP address of the router, and the shared bluetooth IP connection on the PC (there quite commonly is a conflict, that can be resolved by changing the ROUTER's IP address, the shared bluetooth connection IP is hard coded).

Again look at the above thread, that's how I got mine to surf/sync.

D.psi
Thanks for the heads up I am finally able to web browse and check email via the BT Lan connection now. In my case I had to do 2 things. Change the IP of my wireless router and change the settings of the BT network profile on the pc (for some reason I had it set for VPN). I'm sure my eyes are playing tricks on me but it sure seems like pages are loading quite a bit faster on my 1945 via BT then they were on the 2215 using Wi-Fi. Ain't complaining though
 
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2004, 11:56 PM
5000+ Posts? I Should OWN This Site!
ctmagnus's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 5,769

I can't remember the exact details, but I believe I just followed the installation instructions for the BT adapter and then bonded the two network connetions (LAN + BT) under XP. This permitted me to surf happily, using a 10.x.x.x subnet.
__________________
iPhone 3GS! ☠☠☠ Treo Pro!
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:48 PM.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7