Pocket PC Thoughts - Daily News, Views, Rants and Raves

Check out the hottest Windows Mobile devices at our Expansys store!





Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > POCKET PC THOUGHTS > Pocket PC Multimedia

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2004, 06:24 AM
Ponderer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 65
Default HP Photosmart mobile camera for iPAQ (Is it worth buying?)

Is the HP Photosmart mobile camera for iPAQ worth buying??? I am looking for a simple camera for IPAQ that has decent quality. Has anyone tried it? Does anyone have a better suggestion PPC???
__________________
Visor Neo--> Visor Prism--> Tungsten T3--> HP IPAQ rx3115-->American Eagle"Never Forget, Never Surrender (9-11)
 
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-13-2004, 01:21 PM
Ponderer
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 76
Send a message via MSN to kahchong
Default Re: The HP Photosmart Mobile Camera

The new HP Photosmart Mobile Camera is certainly worth buying because this is the world's first pocket pc camera that support SDIO card slot, other brands only support the CF card slot. Besides that, the camera can zoom for up to 4x digital zoom and best of all it can record unlimited video until your memory card has been filled up. Best of all, every photo that you have taken will be automatically synchronized when u start activesync.

It also comes with a software that improves the IPAQ Image Viewer with the IPAQ Image Zone that is better and can view images bigger and faster. I hope that you will like it.

Kah Chong.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2004, 05:13 AM
Intellectual
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 190
Send a message via MSN to Trimac20
Default re

Sounds interesting, but I quick question. What is the maximum resolution you can record video in? Anything less than 640 x 480 is just plain unviewable. Also, is there the ability to pause, zoom.etc (unlike many digital cameras)? What is the flash like? Thanks.
 
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-17-2004, 06:25 AM
Contributing Editor Emeritus
marlof's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,321

You can read a review of the HP camera at iPAQabilities. It doesn't do 640x480 (I agree: that would be great, but 320x240 is better than nothing!). An alternative would be the Spectec SD camera that pocketnow.com reviewed, but it looks like that one has some lesser specs.
 
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-19-2004, 12:17 AM
Pupil
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 33

Hey, americaneagle!

I am the one who reviewed the Spectec SD Camera for pocketnow.com. I also own the hp Photosmart Mobile. I would recommend buying the Photosmart over the Spectec. Although it is just a bit more expensive, it is definately worth it. The extra resolution on still images is a definate plus and the hp Photosmart Mobile is an overall higher quality device. The video shooting ability is by far my favorite feature of this camera. Using your device's microphone it also records sound. This is an awesome feature. The only down side is that, if you're like me and your device only has an SD slot, you have little memory to record video to. If you have a CF slot as well then you're set. You can tell the Photosmart Mobile where to save recorded videos and photos. A high capacity CF card means you can record lengthy videos that, althought they are only 320x240, are impressively clear and most certainly usable. If you don't have a CF slot, you might consider the Pocket PC Techs RAM upgrade (if available for your device). This will give you extra built-in RAM where you can store your videos. After all, the hp Photosmart Mobile SD camera, in conjunction with a Pocket PC, is the definately the sleekest, sleuthest camera for its price (not counting the $ it costs to buy a Pocket PC--I'm assuming that you already have one which you use enough to justify the cost). Without a flash, these two SD cameras aren't great for indoor and low light situations. However, I found that shooting videos indoors worked out pretty well. Although they weren't super bright, things were definately visible. In fact, it seemed to me that indoor videos were brighter and looked better than indoor still photos...

Anyway, there's my 2 cents. Have fun.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:12 PM.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7