
03-03-2004, 09:34 AM
|
|
Editor Emeritus
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,968
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Gary Sheynkman
Since I dont know a thing about Linux I will ask our "Dr."
Do you find that linux (due to its larger dependancy of HD speed rather than on raw cpu power) makes for a better multimedia editing machine?
|
I have played a fair bit with Linux, however, I have never had the opportunity to do any multimedia editing on the OS. I have only edited videos on Windows and MacOS. So, regarding your question, I can mainly just hypothesize.
I wouldn't really say that Linux is dependent on HDD speed, at least no more so than Windows or MacOS. After all, all three OS's use virtual memory. Multimedia editing and video capturing and encoding is mainly a CPU bound operation. And unfortunately, platform-specific assembly language is becoming more and more important as newer CPUs rely more on vectored assembly language to gain performance. So ultimately it comes down to the way the program is written for the particular OS and the particular CPU coupled with that OS. Having said this, Linux is a much more lightweight OS compared to Windows or MacOS. So it is easier to reduce the load on the machine and thus freeing up resources for other operations (in this case - multimedia). So, all things being equal, it should potentially be possible to get better results.
Suhit
|
| |
|
|
|