Digital Home Thoughts

Digital Home Thoughts - News & Reviews for the Digital Home

Register in our forums so you're ready for our next giveaway contest...





Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > DIGITAL HOME THOUGHTS > Digital Home Articles & Resources

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2005, 04:00 AM
Contributing Editor
Chris Gohlke's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,506
Default TrustedReviews - Fujifilm FinePix S5500

http://www.trustedreviews.com/article.aspx?page=2574&head=63

"With its SLR-like handling and impressive range of features, the S5500 is a good half-way point between the pocket compact and the serious semi-pro or D-SLR models costing hundreds of pounds more. Its excellent movie mode, big zoom range, good picture quality and solid construction make it a very tempting bargain for the price."



10x optical zoom. Sweet. If I was not intent on saving up for the Rebel XT, this seems like a pretty nice camera.
 
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2005, 04:23 AM
Ponderer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 95
Default Nice Camera

I had this camera in my hands today. I was impressed. I am a dSLR guy, but am looking for a camera for my parents. I liked the feel of the camera, but the best part was the price.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2005, 07:09 AM
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 23,595

How was the shutter lag - could you shoot fast with it?
 
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2005, 10:27 AM
Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 399

Gotta love Fuji's excellent video shooting abilities, they do come handy time after time.

On another note, does any dp expert on this site know if there are any systems or compact cameras that can record clips in 720p yet?

/jizmo
 
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2005, 11:54 AM
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 505

imo this camera fails in one huge point, lack of image stabalization.
 
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2005, 03:36 PM
Pontificator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,315

IS is BS. =P

Shutter lag is nowhere near that of a dslr, even on something as slow as the EOS 300D.
__________________
Baka. Soku. Zan. - The justice behind the dysORDer.
 
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2005, 05:17 PM
Ponderer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 64
Send a message via MSN to ojlittle
Default IS is not BS

I have the Panasonic FZ-20 with two modes of IS. There is a definite difference in picture quality (for the better) when I'm shooting at 12x with IS enabled then when it is not enabled. No comparison actually....
__________________
Mobile Gadgets: hp iPAQ 3715, Motorola MPx 220, Rio Carbon, hp Pavillion x5000, Panasonic DMC-FZ20, Canon Powershot S50
 
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2005, 06:25 PM
Thinker
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 337

IS is for real; you'd be nuts to buy a 10x zoom digicam without it. Consider that the whole reason you're buying this instead of a DSLR is that you're looking for something compact that doesn't require a load of extra pieces to get the job done. There is no way that you'd be able to get sharp images at 10x (about 380mm equivalent) under most circumstances without either IS or a tripod, and the whole point of a camera like this is to not have to carry stuff like a tripod.

I considered this model before I bought my Canon S1 and really loved the handling and feel of it. It also seems to take nice quality images if the test shots on the various review sites are a fair test. But for me there were two problems that could not be overcome. The first is the lack of IS. The second is that it uses xD cards. Sorry Fuji... come back with those two problems solved and we'll talk.
 
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-17-2005, 09:18 PM
Pontificator
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,315

XD cards are indeed the main problem with Olympus and Fuji cameras, which is a pity, considering the cameras. The smiley that forms when you type the card name says it all: XD

IS is useful, but no deal breaker for me. The Fuji at 350mm, gives you an aperture of f/3.1, under 1/3 a stop slower than f/2.8.

Now consider this, at ISO 100, under shade on a cloudy day (which I figure is the average worst case scenario most would want to use such a long focal length), that's about EV 10-11. At f/3.1 that will give you a shutter speed of about 1/80-160, about one to two stops less than the so-called rule of thumb. Proper handling techniques will take you down that one stop, and here's the one advantage non DSLRs that will overcome the one more stop: the lack of a mirror. I find that adds another stop.

Using a Nikon 5700 at 280mm I've hit a shutter speed of 1/80 and still got sharp shots of static objects (something I can't do on a SLR; I'll need at least 1/125). Anything that's moving faster than a sloth at that shutter speed and focal length will probably be blurred. However, even IS won't save you then.
__________________
Baka. Soku. Zan. - The justice behind the dysORDer.
 
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-18-2005, 09:11 AM
Philosopher
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 505

Yea IS is in no way helpfull if your trying to sharpen moving objects. It only compensates for small motions in the camera due to jiggling of the arms.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:57 AM.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC7