
02-09-2009, 02:17 AM
|
|
Neophyte
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 2
|
|
I read their review, but I believe their results would've been better if they had had higher-end components.
HP offers a 1GB 9600M GT video card, instead of just the 512MB version. Certainly that would've provided slightly better results. I also don't quite understand how an 8600M GT could best a 9600M GT, as they mentioned.
They had a 5400rpm HDD, but they could've had a 7200rpm drive which certainly would've helped out some, as well. HDD's are always the biggest bottleneck in a system, anyway.
And wouldn't it have helped for them to have a quad-proc in the machine? I'm not certain how much it would impact gaming, but it may have offered some extra speed and power just by default, but especially if the games were optimized to make use of four procs (which, then again, they may have not been coded to do).
They also only had DDR2 RAM, and HP offers DDR3 RAM in the system now, too, which definitely would've helped.
So with these four changes, I would have to think that their results could have and would have been much better than they were.
But they are correct in saying the system is heavy and expensive. I can handle the weight, myself, but the price is a bit tough to swallow. I've been looking at one of these and configuring it the way I want it with a few pieces of software (no MS Office, though - I already have that) and a three-year warranty, pushes the cost up to around $3300, which is insane.
HP really needs to lower their prices. They've been slowly increasing the cost of the components over the last month or so... perhaps they've failed to realize that we're in a horrible recession in the States and increasing pricing isn't going to help their bottom line.
|
| |
|
|
|