|
Overly simplistic, I fear.
Which is to say, he overstates some facts and neglects many crucial aspects of digital TV buying.
While I understand he is targetting a non-technical audience, he makes too many generalizations that border on misinformation and fails to go into the meaningful details that separate a satisfying purchase from a nightmare to come.
Leaving aside mere imprecision (analog tv isn't square and widescreen isn't the shape of movie screens) he dangerously lumps Plasma displays and LCDs into the same short-life category, which is *not* true; LCD lifetimes aproximate tube lifetimes while Plasma usable lifetimes are about half of direct-view tube systems. He also relegates LCDs to the bedroom (what? no 32+ inchers sold on the left side of the pond?).
Worst of all, he fails to discuss the importance of native resolution versus displayable resolution; most plasma-display models on the market are ED resolution displays, not native HD displays. LCD and DLPs, by contrast, are almost all native-HD displays.
I realize this is a distinction to be lost in a continent without HD content, but sooner or later buyers will come across HD content and find it looks no better than their older content because their recent-vintage "HD-compatible" display can't properly render it.
Also odd; his discussion on future tech focuses on a dark-horse (FED) and a marginal competitor(LCOS) but neglects both OLEDs and SED, both of which are entering production this year, as well as the "thin" direct-view tubes now coming on the market. Which is to say, he neglects the techs likely to power 60-plus percent of all future HDTVs (give or take 30%). :wink:
As for his abreviated discussion of Media Center PCs; the less said, the better. The record shows he favors saddling a ten-year lifetime device (a high-res display) with a built-in obsolescence anchor in the form of a non-upgradebale PC (3-4 year usable lifetime). The manufacturers will be pleased, but I doubt the unwary will...
Caveat Emptor applies to articles (and reviews) as well as commentary. :twisted:
|