|
Well, now, I'm a-thinking this summary/study is slightly flawed...
...as in well-nigh useless...
Because it compares products not by technology but by form factor and in the process obscures the real trends in the industry.
Specifically, it doesn't distinguish between HD micro-display RPTVs (a booming tech) from crt-based rear projection boxes (a fading tech that is being phased out) and it lumps LCDs (an HD tech starting to come down in price and explode in market share) with Plasmas (a mature, mostly ED tech that is at its peak and has nowhere to go but down).
To say nothing of the fact that any lumping of shipments on a world-wide basis will favor the older/cheaper Plasma ED tech because HD is really only relevant in NorthAM and Japan, and since most microdisplay tech is of US provenance, it will perforce be directed at the needs of the local market first; HD instead of ED.
Anybody want to bet that as Europe deploys HD, microdisplay RPTVs will enjoy a boom in sales as they find it the cheapest way to get great quality giant screens? (A 60" 1080p DLP can be had for around $4000 US vs $8-10,000 for a comparable LCD or 720p Plasma.)
What I *would* find meaningful would be a breakdown by market (North Am, Japan, EU, and others) by technology format (SD vs ED vs HD) and technology (crt vs vs crt projection vs microdisplay vs lcd vs plasma).
Then one could make some meaningful judgments as to where the market is going.
Otherwise one is left with the obvious: europe likes plasma because the ED versions are cheap and bright and thin and america likes HD microdisplays because they are cheap and bright and weigh the same or less as plasmas while only occupying a couple more inches of shelf space than the more expensive and smaller plasmas.
To put it another way:
right now, $2000 buys a 42" ED plasma display with a 9-12" footprint or a 50" microdisplay HDTV with a 14-16" footprint at any of the three major retailers in the US (Best Buy, Sears, Circuit City).
In the US, this matters; elsewhere it doesn't.
So fear not, rear projection will remain a viable option for a while, yet.
|