Digital Home Thoughts

Digital Home Thoughts - News & Reviews for the Digital Home

Register in our forums so you're ready for our next giveaway contest...


Zune Thoughts

Loading feed...

Apple Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > DIGITAL HOME THOUGHTS > Digital Home News

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2009, 10:00 PM
Contributing Editor
Hooch Tan's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 918
Send a message via ICQ to Hooch Tan Send a message via MSN to Hooch Tan Send a message via Yahoo to Hooch Tan
Default Megapixel Race May Finally Be Over

http://arstechnica.com/gadgets/news...apixel-race.ars

"Megapixels are the digital camera market's equivalent of horsepower and megahertz—a single metric that consumers and marketers latch on to tenaciously, despite the fact that it hardly describes overall performance. Over the last several years, camera manufacturers have been pumping up the megapixels on each successive camera model, regardless of whether such increases offered any real benefits (hint: they usually did not)."

Manufacturers have always had the tough challenge of benchmarking or rating electronics.  With CPUs you have Mhz/Ghz, with TVs you have resolution (and contrast ratio, and response time and brightness) and with cameras you have megapixels.  All these ratings fall short of considering everything that's important in electronics.  Fortunately, it seems that cameras have hit such a plateau that megapixels won't mean much anymore.  Of course, camera manufacturers will probably switch to other simplistic numbers to promote their wares but at least we won't see ads for 250 megapixel cameras that come with a free 256mb SD card.  Olyumpus seems to think that 12 megapixels should be enough to satisfy all but the most discrinimating photog.  Ars Technica thinks 6 should be more than adequate for most people.  Being largely unbitten by the bug, I hit my comfort zone at 4.  I just hope that they'll now focus more on improved colour reproduction, less distortion and good performance under low light conditions.  Yes, high end, and even prosumer cameras can do that, but I'm waiting for then them to do that with camera phones.  Now I'll go hang my head in shame for revealing just how casual a photographer I am.

 
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-09-2009, 11:32 PM
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,135

Cool article - I agree with basically all of it. Once my cameras hit the 8 to 12mp range, it largely became a matter of "So what?". I'd MUCH rather have a small point and shoot camera with "only" 8mp if it had great low-light performance from a great sensor.

I do value higher megapixels for when it comes to cropping, but I tend to do more serious cropping on my DSLR images. I find that with some of my point and shoot images, images that I keep for memories sake but not for printing, I tend to resize them down a bit to get the file sizes down from 2MB to 1MB or less. Yes, hard drives are crazy big, but it always a good thing to have a tidy photographic house.
__________________
Want to contact me personally? Use this. Want to read my personal blog? Check it out. Want to follow me on Twitter? Here you go.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:06 PM.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0