
09-10-2009, 06:39 PM
|
|
Sage
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 637
|
|
I'm sorry, but having two architectures--LGA 1366 and LGA 1156--for the same basic technology is a serious black mark against Intel. I really don't understand the logic. I get that one is dual channel and the other triple, but otherwise they are identical, confusing, and a downright dirty trick played on early adopters of the LGA 1366 line. I know of a number of folks who jumped on 1G Core i7 products hoping to "future-proof" themselves (more research might have swayed them from this path, sure). Now they are stuck with a strange step-child architecture that is not slated to get any mainstream attention and actually underperforms these "consumer" i7's. Yeah, a Gulfstream processor is coming sometime next year, but the 1156 platform is getting the bulk of the performance enhancement.
And why confuse matters by giving both the i7 moniker? That is insane. Now you have to see if this is a 1366 i7 or a 1156 i7. Would have been really easy to make the 1156 i7 and i5 HT or something (after all, it is just an i5 with Hyperthreading).
Anyway, aside from that, I'm really glad to see these processors coming out and finally giving consumers a true "future" direction to aim for.
|
| |
|
|
|