Digital Home Thoughts

Digital Home Thoughts - News & Reviews for the Digital Home

Register in our forums so you're ready for our next giveaway contest...


Zune Thoughts

Loading feed...

Apple Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > DIGITAL HOME THOUGHTS > Digital Home Talk

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2004, 02:00 PM
Mystic
James Fee's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,819
Send a message via AIM to James Fee Send a message via MSN to James Fee Send a message via Yahoo to James Fee Send a message via Skype™ to James Fee
Default Yet another codec: Nero Digital

http://www.tmcnet.com/usubmit/2004/Sep/1071837.htm

"Optimised Nero Digital(TM) DSP hardware, VHDL core, Nero Digital(TM) Mobile, DRM base band decoder, and enhanced MPEG-4 H264/AVC and PS/HE/AAC Nero Recode and Nero ShowTime, all to be presented at IBC. Ahead Software, leaders in digital media technology, will exhibit a formidable line-up of Nero Digital(TM) technologies all taking advantage of an unrivalled quality and performance breakthrough currently changing the face of video and audio compression. Centred around MPEG-4, Nero Digital(TM) is the World's only complete codec solution embracing MPEG-4 video, and AAC (Advanced Audio Coding), LC and HE (High Efficiency) with Parametric Stereo extensions. In fact, in recent 32kbps blind listening tests conducted by the respected Hydrogen Audio community, Nero Digital(TM) audio came out on top surpassing established codec's such as mp3PRO, WMA, Real, and Vorbis."

This is good news. I was just sitting around the other day thinking to myself, "You know what the world needs? A new MPEG-4 codec." :roll:

I can't imagine who will actually use this thing. Apple sure won't, Real has their own. Who else uses MPEG-4 or AAC? Sure there is mention of Pocket PC or Smartphones, but using anything other than WMV/WMA is really a pain in the rear. This "article" seems to be written in a way to make a codec with no future, look like it has one.

Well one thing for sure, if I am ever encoding audio at 33 kbps, I know what codec I am going to use.

:drinking:
 
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 09-17-2004, 07:49 PM
Sage
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 735
Send a message via MSN to klinux

Yeah, who encodes at 32K?

Getting people unified on a lossless codec should be the way to go at this point.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:12 PM.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2