Digital Home Thoughts

Digital Home Thoughts - News & Reviews for the Digital Home

Register in our forums so you're ready for our next giveaway contest...


Zune Thoughts

Loading feed...

Apple Thoughts

Loading feed...

Laptop Thoughts

Loading feed...




Go Back   Thoughts Media Forums > DIGITAL HOME THOUGHTS > Digital Home Talk

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2004, 03:40 PM
Mystic
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,592
Default Could someone explain to me

why in PCWorld's latest issue (buying guide), there are some digicams listed in their top 10 that just have "fair" picture quality? Are we to obsessed by bells,whistles and megapixels? I always thought the true judge of a camera was the quality of the picture it took. But what do I know :roll:
 
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2004, 05:15 PM
Contributing Editor
Lee Yuan Sheng's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,485

Firstly, most computer magazines aren't very good at reviewing digital cameras, so I'd take the ratings and rankings with a lot of salt.

Secondly, there are other factors that are just as important than image quality, because the camera that produces the highest quality isn't going to be of any use if it can't take the picture. So things like lens used, the photographic capabilities of the camera, egronomics, user interface, size, weight etc are all important factors in choosing a camera.
__________________
Baka. Soku. Zan. - The justice behind the dysORDer.
 
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2004, 07:07 PM
Executive Editor
Jason Dunn's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 29,135

Picture quality is in the eye of the beholder, meaning that for Joe Average consumer, a camera that's easy to use and affordable might be a better choice than a camera that takes amazing photos but is 2x more expensive and 5x harder to use. For me, image quality is critical, but I'd sacrifice a bit of image quality to get a wicked fast shutter lag - which is why I'm looking at the Casio Exilim. The Exilim picture quality is good, but not GREAT, yet I'm willing to overlook that because it takes photos as quickly as my Canon Digital Rebel.
 
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 11-25-2004, 07:17 PM
Mystic
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,592

I understand going with "good" as opposed to "very good or excellent" if it had other compelling features. I just don't think "fair" belongs in a top 10 list. Like Jason,shutter lag time is important to me.
 
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 11-26-2004, 02:41 AM
Contributing Editor
Lee Yuan Sheng's Avatar
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,485

Why not? At least it's not "poor" or "awful". Fair is probably just that.. suitable for 90% of the people out there, who print mostly 4x6s, with the occasional 8x10.
__________________
Baka. Soku. Zan. - The justice behind the dysORDer.
 
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 12-21-2004, 07:05 AM
Ponderer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 100

I would have to agree with Lee.

If you go to a National Park this summer. 80% of the Americans that are shooting film are are using a carboard camera.
 
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:37 AM.



Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO 3.6.0