Log in

View Full Version : WiGig Promises Really Fast Wireless


Reid Kistler
12-31-2009, 05:00 PM
<div class='os_post_top_link'><a href='http://www.ehomeupgrade.com/2009/12/10/wigig-60ghz-7gbps-wireless-networking-standard-hits-1-0-status/#more-14534' target='_blank'>http://www.ehomeupgrade.com/2009/12...tus/#more-14534</a><br /><br /></div><p><em>"Most likely you've never heard of the WiGig wireless standard created by the <a href="http://wirelessgigabitalliance.org/" target="_blank">Wireless Gigabit Alliance</a>. If you haven't, that's OK because today the group is announcing the WiGig version 1.0 specification, which they hope will become implemented in home networking gear as early as the first quarter of 2010. So why should you care? We've got dual-band 802.11n now, right? Well, because WiGig is 10 times faster than 802.11n, with transfer rates up to 7Gbps, and is backwards compatible with 802.11b/g/n."</em></p><p><img src="http://images.thoughtsmedia.com/resizer/thumbs/size/600/dht/auto/1262116738.usr19541.jpg" style="border: 0;" /></p><p>Alexander Grundner at eHomeUpgrade picked up on&nbsp;a press release for the Wireless WiGig Alliance that promises products by...well, the press release does not actually say when WiGig products will be available, and neither does the WiGig website - only that they will&nbsp;operate in the&nbsp;60 GHz band, at speeds of 1 Gbps to over&nbsp;6 Gbps. Might sound a bit&nbsp;like vaporware, but with a Board of Directors that includes&nbsp;such leading technology companies as Broadcom,&nbsp;Dell, Intel, Microsoft, NEC,&nbsp;NVIDIA and Samsung Electronics it seems reasonable to expect real world products eventually.&nbsp;A good question might be: "If you are planning an 802.11n implementation, will you wait for WiGig?"</p>

Jason Dunn
12-31-2009, 11:34 PM
I'm still waiting for 802.11n devices and routers to be as stable as 802.11b used to be five years ago...so I'm not holding my breath that WiGig will prove to be anything but a disaster in the short term. :rolleyes:

Reid Kistler
01-01-2010, 01:18 AM
Yes, it seems like 802.11n spent a LONG time in "pre-release" mode!

We moved to a D-Link MIMO "Super-G" solution for our home network at one time, and that worked rather well (were able to get rid of a plain-Jane "G" Range Extender due to the increased signal strength!).

OTOH, when we moved from Bright House Cable to AT&T U-verse, AT&T provided a 802.11g "Residential Gateway" (modem / wired & wireless router / VOIP phone adapter / tv adapter), and that also provides enough signal that we did not have to put the range extender back into place - and we have sufficient bandwidth to run multiple computers simultaneously, although we do little wireless media streaming.

Upshot is that we probably won't update our home wireless until / unless AT&T does, even though it is certainly possible to mount another system behind their router....